1998Econstor (Econstor)Open access

Stable demands and bargaining power in majority games

Maria Antonietta Castiglione Morelli

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

This paper provides a co-operative as well as a non-cooperative analysis of weighted majority games. The co-operative solution concept introduced here, the Stable Demand Set, yields a meaningful selection within the Mas-Colell Bargaining Set, it contains the Core, it eliminates the "dominated" coalition structures, and has sharp implications for weighted majority games: for such games it is non-empty, it predicts a unique stable demand vector for every homogeneous representation, and every agent within the winning coalition is expected to obtain a payoff share proportional to her relative bargaining power. The set of stable demand vectors coincides with the set of balanced aspirations defined in Bennet (1983), but it is obtained in the space of individually rational payoff configurations, rather than restricting attention to the aspirations domain. I then define two different kinds of non-cooperative coalitional bargaining games, showing that the set of Symmetric Stationary Subgames Perfect Equilibria of one of them, and the set of Subgame Perfect Equilibria of the other, have a one-to-one correspondence with the Stable Demand Set for homogeneous weighted majority games.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper provides a co-operative as well as a non-cooperative analysis of weighted majority games. The co-operative solution concept introduced here, the Stable Demand Set, yields a meaningful selection within the Mas-Colell Bargaining Set, it contains the Core, it eliminates the "dominated" coalition structures, and has sharp implications for weighted majority games: for such games it is non-empty, it predicts a unique stable demand vector for every homogeneous representation, and every agent within the winning coalition is expected to obtain a payoff share proportional to her relative bargaining power. The set of stable demand vectors coincides with the set of balanced aspirations defined in Bennet (1983), but it is obtained in the space of individually rational payoff configurations, rather than restricting attention to the aspirations domain. I then define two different kinds of non-cooperative coalitional bargaining games, showing that the set of Symmetric Stationary Subgames Perfect Equilibria of one of them, and the set of Subgame Perfect Equilibria of the other, have a one-to-one correspondence with the Stable Demand Set for homogeneous weighted majority games.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper provides a co-operative as well as a non-cooperative analysis of weighted majority games. The co-operative solution concept introduced here, the Stable Demand Set, yields a meaningful selection within the Mas-Colell Bargaining Set, it contains the Core, it eliminates the "dominated" coalition structures, and has sharp implications for weighted majority games: for such games it is non-empty, it predicts a unique stable demand vector for every homogeneous representation, and every agent within the winning coalition is expected to obtain a payoff share proportional to her relative bargaining power. The set of stable demand vectors coincides with the set of balanced aspirations defined in Bennet (1983), but it is obtained in the space of individually rational payoff configurations, rather than restricting attention to the aspirations domain. I then define two different kinds of non-cooperative coalitional bargaining games, showing that the set of Symmetric Stationary Subgames Perfect Equilibria of one of them, and the set of Subgame Perfect Equilibria of the other, have a one-to-one correspondence with the Stable Demand Set for homogeneous weighted majority games.

Key concepts: Mathematical economics, Stochastic game, Subgame perfect equilibrium, Set (abstract data type), Mathematics, Core (optical fiber), Domain (mathematical analysis), Representation (politics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Stable demands and bargaining power in majority games — Research Paper | ScholarLens