2015Annals of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineOpen access

Diagnostic Value of Cytokeratin 5 and Cytokeratin 6 in Benign and Malignant Lesions of Breast

Kafil Akhtar, Sanjay Bharduaj, Mohammed Naïm, Tariq Mansoor, Rana K Sherwani

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

Background: Correlation of Cytokeratin 5 and Cytokeratin 6 expression in benign and malignant lesions of the female breast-ducts and to find out the utility of Cytokeratin 5/6 in the prognosis of carcinoma breast. Methods: The present study was carried out on 78 benign and malignant lesions of breast. Tissues were fixed in formal saline, processed for paraffin sections and stained with Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) stain. Immunohistochemical staining was performed using mouse antihuman polyclonal D5/16B4 antibody for cytokeratin 5/6 and visualization obtained with DAB and the slides were examined for staining pattern (cytoplasmic or membrane), proportion and intensity of staining of tumour cells. Results: Amongst the 78 cases of breast lesions, 38 (48.7%) cases were benign breast disease, 18 (23.1%) were ductal carcinoma in situ and 22 (28.2%) cases were of malignant breast carcinoma. Out of 22 cases of malignant breast disease, 16 (72.7%) cases showed negative cytokeratin reaction with staining score of  <2 and 6 (27.3%) cases of triple negative breast carcinoma (TNBC) showed positive cytokeratin expression with staining score  of 5-8. Conclusions: Immunohistochemistry is efficiently used for differentiating the UDH (usual-ductal-hyperplasia) from the DCIS (ductal carcinoma in situ), ruling out micro-invasion, distinguishing invasive carcinoma from pseudo-invasive lesions, identifying breast cancer histological sub-type and molecular phenotype.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: Correlation of Cytokeratin 5 and Cytokeratin 6 expression in benign and malignant lesions of the female breast-ducts and to find out the utility of Cytokeratin 5/6 in the prognosis of carcinoma breast. Methods: The present study was carried out on 78 benign and malignant lesions of breast. Tissues were fixed in formal saline, processed for paraffin sections and stained with Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) stain. Immunohistochemical staining was performed using mouse antihuman polyclonal D5/16B4 antibody for cytokeratin 5/6 and visualization obtained with DAB and the slides were examined for staining pattern (cytoplasmic or membrane), proportion and intensity of staining of tumour cells. Results: Amongst the 78 cases of breast lesions, 38 (48.7%) cases were benign breast disease, 18 (23.1%) were ductal carcinoma in situ and 22 (28.2%) cases were of malignant breast carcinoma. Out of 22 cases of malignant breast disease, 16 (72.7%) cases showed negative cytokeratin reaction with staining score of  <2 and 6 (27.3%) cases of triple negative breast carcinoma (TNBC) showed positive cytokeratin expression with staining score  of 5-8. Conclusions: Immunohistochemistry is efficiently used for differentiating the UDH (usual-ductal-hyperplasia) from the DCIS (ductal carcinoma in situ), ruling out micro-invasion, distinguishing invasive carcinoma from pseudo-invasive lesions, identifying breast cancer histological sub-type and molecular phenotype.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: Correlation of Cytokeratin 5 and Cytokeratin 6 expression in benign and malignant lesions of the female breast-ducts and to find out the utility of Cytokeratin 5/6 in the prognosis of carcinoma breast. Methods: The present study was carried out on 78 benign and malignant lesions of breast. Tissues were fixed in formal saline, processed for paraffin sections and stained with Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) stain. Immunohistochemical staining was performed using mouse antihuman polyclonal D5/16B4 antibody for cytokeratin 5/6 and visualization obtained with DAB and the slides were examined for staining pattern (cytoplasmic or membrane), proportion and intensity of staining of tumour cells. Results: Amongst the 78 cases of breast lesions, 38 (48.7%) cases were benign breast disease, 18 (23.1%) were ductal carcinoma in situ and 22 (28.2%) cases were of malignant breast carcinoma. Out of 22 cases of malignant breast disease, 16 (72.7%) cases showed negative cytokeratin reaction with staining score of  <2 and 6 (27.3%) cases of triple negative breast carcinoma (TNBC) showed positive cytokeratin expression with staining score  of 5-8. Conclusions: Immunohistochemistry is efficiently used for differentiating the UDH (usual-ductal-hyperplasia) from the DCIS (ductal carcinoma in situ), ruling out micro-invasion, distinguishing invasive carcinoma from pseudo-invasive lesions, identifying breast cancer histological sub-type and molecular phenotype.

Key concepts: Cytokeratin, Pathology, Medicine, Staining, Immunohistochemistry, Ductal carcinoma, Breast cancer, Carcinoma

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Diagnostic Value of Cytokeratin 5 and Cytokeratin 6 in Benign and Malignant Lesions of Breast — Research Paper | ScholarLens