2014Unpublished venueRequires access

What Factors Facilitate Environmental Practices Through the Supply Chain? The Case of Scope 3

Hakaru Iguchi, Hajime Katayama, Toshi H. Arimura

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Using data from a survey of Japanese manufacturing firms, we identified the determinants of a firm’s choice to measure Scope 3 emissions, which are all indirect emissions that occur in the supply chain of firms, including both upstream and downstream emissions. Our result shows that the firms that were asked by stakeholders, such as investors and consumers, to reduce GHG emissions tend to measure more Scope 3 categories. Additionally, for these firms, requests for information disclosure from their customers have a stronger effect on measuring Scope 3 emissions. In the case of measuring Scope 3 emissions, which requires cooperation with suppliers and customers, requests from downstream of the supply chain play an important role. We also found that being subject to Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) or answering to CDP questionnaire induces firms to measure Scope 3 emissions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Using data from a survey of Japanese manufacturing firms, we identified the determinants of a firm’s choice to measure Scope 3 emissions, which are all indirect emissions that occur in the supply chain of firms, including both upstream and downstream emissions. Our result shows that the firms that were asked by stakeholders, such as investors and consumers, to reduce GHG emissions tend to measure more Scope 3 categories. Additionally, for these firms, requests for information disclosure from their customers have a stronger effect on measuring Scope 3 emissions. In the case of measuring Scope 3 emissions, which requires cooperation with suppliers and customers, requests from downstream of the supply chain play an important role. We also found that being subject to Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) or answering to CDP questionnaire induces firms to measure Scope 3 emissions.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Using data from a survey of Japanese manufacturing firms, we identified the determinants of a firm’s choice to measure Scope 3 emissions, which are all indirect emissions that occur in the supply chain of firms, including both upstream and downstream emissions. Our result shows that the firms that were asked by stakeholders, such as investors and consumers, to reduce GHG emissions tend to measure more Scope 3 categories. Additionally, for these firms, requests for information disclosure from their customers have a stronger effect on measuring Scope 3 emissions. In the case of measuring Scope 3 emissions, which requires cooperation with suppliers and customers, requests from downstream of the supply chain play an important role. We also found that being subject to Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) or answering to CDP questionnaire induces firms to measure Scope 3 emissions.

Key concepts: Scope (computer science), Business, Supply chain, Upstream (networking), Downstream (manufacturing), Greenhouse gas, Industrial organization, Measure (data warehouse)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
What Factors Facilitate Environmental Practices Through the Supply Chain? The Case of Scope 3 — Research Paper | ScholarLens