Loss Evaluation of Soybean Harvesting on Four Types of Headers
Yasumaru Hirai, M. D. Schrock, Devanand Maski, Randal K. Taylor
Abstract
Yasumaru Hirai, M. D. Schrock, Devanand Maski, Randal K. Taylor
Abstract
Soybean header losses were evaluated on four header configurations: rigidheader, flexible header, row crop header, and rigid header with milo guards. The formerthree headers have commonly been used for soybean harvesting. The results of fieldtests showed the lowest loss in the rigid header followed by flexible header, row cropheader, and rigid header with milo guards. The evaluation results were different fromthose previously reported, which typically found the least loss with a row crop headerfollowed by flexible header and rigid header. The difference of header losses amongfour headers was not statistically significant. For the effect of the milo guard on headerlosses, the advantage on all kinds of losses, which include stalk, stubble, lodged, andshatter losses, was not shown.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Soybean header losses were evaluated on four header configurations: rigidheader, flexible header, row crop header, and rigid header with milo guards. The formerthree headers have commonly been used for soybean harvesting. The results of fieldtests showed the lowest loss in the rigid header followed by flexible header, row cropheader, and rigid header with milo guards. The evaluation results were different fromthose previously reported, which typically found the least loss with a row crop headerfollowed by flexible header and rigid header. The difference of header losses amongfour headers was not statistically significant. For the effect of the milo guard on headerlosses, the advantage on all kinds of losses, which include stalk, stubble, lodged, andshatter losses, was not shown.
Key concepts: Header, Computer science, Computer network