2013Unpublished venueRequires access

Loss Evaluation of Soybean Harvesting on Four Types of Headers

Yasumaru Hirai, M. D. Schrock, Devanand Maski, Randal K. Taylor

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Soybean header losses were evaluated on four header configurations: rigidheader, flexible header, row crop header, and rigid header with milo guards. The formerthree headers have commonly been used for soybean harvesting. The results of fieldtests showed the lowest loss in the rigid header followed by flexible header, row cropheader, and rigid header with milo guards. The evaluation results were different fromthose previously reported, which typically found the least loss with a row crop headerfollowed by flexible header and rigid header. The difference of header losses amongfour headers was not statistically significant. For the effect of the milo guard on headerlosses, the advantage on all kinds of losses, which include stalk, stubble, lodged, andshatter losses, was not shown.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Soybean header losses were evaluated on four header configurations: rigidheader, flexible header, row crop header, and rigid header with milo guards. The formerthree headers have commonly been used for soybean harvesting. The results of fieldtests showed the lowest loss in the rigid header followed by flexible header, row cropheader, and rigid header with milo guards. The evaluation results were different fromthose previously reported, which typically found the least loss with a row crop headerfollowed by flexible header and rigid header. The difference of header losses amongfour headers was not statistically significant. For the effect of the milo guard on headerlosses, the advantage on all kinds of losses, which include stalk, stubble, lodged, andshatter losses, was not shown.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Soybean header losses were evaluated on four header configurations: rigidheader, flexible header, row crop header, and rigid header with milo guards. The formerthree headers have commonly been used for soybean harvesting. The results of fieldtests showed the lowest loss in the rigid header followed by flexible header, row cropheader, and rigid header with milo guards. The evaluation results were different fromthose previously reported, which typically found the least loss with a row crop headerfollowed by flexible header and rigid header. The difference of header losses amongfour headers was not statistically significant. For the effect of the milo guard on headerlosses, the advantage on all kinds of losses, which include stalk, stubble, lodged, andshatter losses, was not shown.

Key concepts: Header, Computer science, Computer network

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Loss Evaluation of Soybean Harvesting on Four Types of Headers — Research Paper | ScholarLens