2006Unpublished venueRequires access

Safety and Efficacy of Duloxetine Versus Venlafaxine in Major Depression in Indian Patients

Dinesh Badyal, Prem Parkash Khosla, Rajinder S. Deswal, Prithpal Singh Matreja

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

The objective of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of duloxetine and venlafaxine in major depressive disorder. The study was conducted in 26 patients suffering from major depressive disorder as per DSM-IV criteria. Patients were randomized to two groups and were given duloxetine (20,40,60mg BD) and venlafaxine (75,150,225mg OD) for 6 weeks. The primary efficacy parameter was the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17). Secondary efficacy parameters included the Montgomery and Asberg depression rating scale (MADRS) and clinical global impression (CGI) scale. Safety evaluation was based on treatment emergent adverse effects and laboratory investigations. There was significant decrease in HDRS, MADRS, CGI scores from baseline to endpoint (p<0.05) in both the groups. However the difference in scores between two groups was not statistically significant. Total mean HDRS score decreased from 27(SD=2.5) to 4 (SD=1.2) in duloxetine group and from 29(SD=2.3) to 4 (SD=1.0) in venlafaxine group at the end of therapy. Response and remission rate was 96% and 69% in duloxetine group as compared to 92% and 62% in venlafaxine group respectively. There was no significant difference in adverse effects and laboratory investigation in two groups. The findings of this study indicate that duloxetine may be an effective and safe antidepressant in Indian patients of major depressive disorder. It is equally effective to venlafaxine in patients of depression.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The objective of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of duloxetine and venlafaxine in major depressive disorder. The study was conducted in 26 patients suffering from major depressive disorder as per DSM-IV criteria. Patients were randomized to two groups and were given duloxetine (20,40,60mg BD) and venlafaxine (75,150,225mg OD) for 6 weeks. The primary efficacy parameter was the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17). Secondary efficacy parameters included the Montgomery and Asberg depression rating scale (MADRS) and clinical global impression (CGI) scale. Safety evaluation was based on treatment emergent adverse effects and laboratory investigations. There was significant decrease in HDRS, MADRS, CGI scores from baseline to endpoint (p<0.05) in both the groups. However the difference in scores between two groups was not statistically significant. Total mean HDRS score decreased from 27(SD=2.5) to 4 (SD=1.2) in duloxetine group and from 29(SD=2.3) to 4 (SD=1.0) in venlafaxine group at the end of therapy. Response and remission rate was 96% and 69% in duloxetine group as compared to 92% and 62% in venlafaxine group respectively. There was no significant difference in adverse effects and laboratory investigation in two groups. The findings of this study indicate that duloxetine may be an effective and safe antidepressant in Indian patients of major depressive disorder. It is equally effective to venlafaxine in patients of depression.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The objective of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of duloxetine and venlafaxine in major depressive disorder. The study was conducted in 26 patients suffering from major depressive disorder as per DSM-IV criteria. Patients were randomized to two groups and were given duloxetine (20,40,60mg BD) and venlafaxine (75,150,225mg OD) for 6 weeks. The primary efficacy parameter was the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17). Secondary efficacy parameters included the Montgomery and Asberg depression rating scale (MADRS) and clinical global impression (CGI) scale. Safety evaluation was based on treatment emergent adverse effects and laboratory investigations. There was significant decrease in HDRS, MADRS, CGI scores from baseline to endpoint (p<0.05) in both the groups. However the difference in scores between two groups was not statistically significant. Total mean HDRS score decreased from 27(SD=2.5) to 4 (SD=1.2) in duloxetine group and from 29(SD=2.3) to 4 (SD=1.0) in venlafaxine group at the end of therapy. Response and remission rate was 96% and 69% in duloxetine group as compared to 92% and 62% in venlafaxine group respectively. There was no significant difference in adverse effects and laboratory investigation in two groups. The findings of this study indicate that duloxetine may be an effective and safe antidepressant in Indian patients of major depressive disorder. It is equally effective to venlafaxine in patients of depression.

Key concepts: Duloxetine, Venlafaxine, Rating scale, Clinical Global Impression, Major depressive disorder, Internal medicine, Depression (economics), Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Safety and Efficacy of Duloxetine Versus Venlafaxine in Major Depression in Indian Patients — Research Paper | ScholarLens