2012Unpublished venueRequires access

Conflict of Interest Policies and Information Efficiency

Katherine Campbell, Duane Helleloid

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Where conflicts of interest exist for professionals, difficult decisions must be made regarding when conflicts of interest should be allowed, while being disclosed, monitored, and managed. At other times, the conflicts need to be eliminated or avoided. Current trends in practice trend towards the elimination of conflicts of interest, partly as a response to extensive publicity over some very questionable activities when individuals clearly had conflicts of interest. In many instances the public interest is best served when conflicts of interest are clearly avoided, public trust is reinforced, and there is not even the appearance of impropriety. Yet at times conflicts of interest are better managed than avoided, especially when the potential interests of all stakeholders are considered. When new rules governing conflicts of interest are developed, the primary emphasis is typically on the implications for the principal organization writing the rules, and the public perception of this organization. The interests of the employees of this organization, to whom the rules are applied, are also considered. With much less frequency, the implications of conflict of interest rules on other stakeholders are considered. The position taken in this paper is that the interests of multiple stakeholders should be considered when conflict of interest policies are developed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Where conflicts of interest exist for professionals, difficult decisions must be made regarding when conflicts of interest should be allowed, while being disclosed, monitored, and managed. At other times, the conflicts need to be eliminated or avoided. Current trends in practice trend towards the elimination of conflicts of interest, partly as a response to extensive publicity over some very questionable activities when individuals clearly had conflicts of interest. In many instances the public interest is best served when conflicts of interest are clearly avoided, public trust is reinforced, and there is not even the appearance of impropriety. Yet at times conflicts of interest are better managed than avoided, especially when the potential interests of all stakeholders are considered. When new rules governing conflicts of interest are developed, the primary emphasis is typically on the implications for the principal organization writing the rules, and the public perception of this organization. The interests of the employees of this organization, to whom the rules are applied, are also considered. With much less frequency, the implications of conflict of interest rules on other stakeholders are considered. The position taken in this paper is that the interests of multiple stakeholders should be considered when conflict of interest policies are developed.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Where conflicts of interest exist for professionals, difficult decisions must be made regarding when conflicts of interest should be allowed, while being disclosed, monitored, and managed. At other times, the conflicts need to be eliminated or avoided. Current trends in practice trend towards the elimination of conflicts of interest, partly as a response to extensive publicity over some very questionable activities when individuals clearly had conflicts of interest. In many instances the public interest is best served when conflicts of interest are clearly avoided, public trust is reinforced, and there is not even the appearance of impropriety. Yet at times conflicts of interest are better managed than avoided, especially when the potential interests of all stakeholders are considered. When new rules governing conflicts of interest are developed, the primary emphasis is typically on the implications for the principal organization writing the rules, and the public perception of this organization. The interests of the employees of this organization, to whom the rules are applied, are also considered. With much less frequency, the implications of conflict of interest rules on other stakeholders are considered. The position taken in this paper is that the interests of multiple stakeholders should be considered when conflict of interest policies are developed.

Key concepts: Appearance of impropriety, Public interest, Conflict of interest, Publicity, Special Interest Group, Public relations, Principal (computer security), Perception

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Conflict of Interest Policies and Information Efficiency — Research Paper | ScholarLens