2007Unpublished venueRequires access

Testing for One Factor Models versus Stochastic Volatility Models, in the Presence of Jumps.∗

Valentina Corradi, Walter Distaso

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

This paper provides a testing procedure which allows to discriminate between one factor and stochastic volatility models, under minimal assumptions. In particular, apart from standard regularity conditions, no assumptions are made on the functional forms of either the drift or the variance term. The suggested test statistic can be seen as an Hausman type test. In fact, our test is constructed by comparing two estimators of integrated volatility: one is a kernel estimator of the instantaneous variance, averaged over the sample realization on a fixed time span; the other is realized volatility. Under the null hypothesis of a one factor model, both estimators are consistent for the “true ” integrated volatility, but the former is more efficient. Under the alternative hypothesis, the kernel type estimator is not consistent, while realized volatility retains the consistency property. A version of the test which is robust to the presence

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper provides a testing procedure which allows to discriminate between one factor and stochastic volatility models, under minimal assumptions. In particular, apart from standard regularity conditions, no assumptions are made on the functional forms of either the drift or the variance term. The suggested test statistic can be seen as an Hausman type test. In fact, our test is constructed by comparing two estimators of integrated volatility: one is a kernel estimator of the instantaneous variance, averaged over the sample realization on a fixed time span; the other is realized volatility. Under the null hypothesis of a one factor model, both estimators are consistent for the “true ” integrated volatility, but the former is more efficient. Under the alternative hypothesis, the kernel type estimator is not consistent, while realized volatility retains the consistency property. A version of the test which is robust to the presence

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper provides a testing procedure which allows to discriminate between one factor and stochastic volatility models, under minimal assumptions. In particular, apart from standard regularity conditions, no assumptions are made on the functional forms of either the drift or the variance term. The suggested test statistic can be seen as an Hausman type test. In fact, our test is constructed by comparing two estimators of integrated volatility: one is a kernel estimator of the instantaneous variance, averaged over the sample realization on a fixed time span; the other is realized volatility. Under the null hypothesis of a one factor model, both estimators are consistent for the “true ” integrated volatility, but the former is more efficient. Under the alternative hypothesis, the kernel type estimator is not consistent, while realized volatility retains the consistency property. A version of the test which is robust to the presence

Key concepts: Stochastic volatility, Econometrics, Mathematics, Estimator, Volatility (finance), Hausman test, Realized variance, Forward volatility

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Testing for One Factor Models versus Stochastic Volatility Models, in the Presence of Jumps.∗ — Research Paper | ScholarLens