2014CLEI electronic journalOpen access

Bioinformatics Performance Comparison of Many-core Tile64 vs. Multi-core Intel Xeon

Myriam Kurtz, Francisco J. Esteban, Pilar Hernández, Juan Antonio Caballero, Antonio Guevara, Gabriel Dorado, Sergio Gálvez

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

The performance of the many-core Tile64 versus the multi-core Xeon x86 architecture on bioinformatics has been compared. We have used the pairwise algorithm MC64-NW/SW that we have previously developed to align nucleic acid (DNA and RNA) and peptide (protein) sequences for the benchmarking, being an enhanced and parallel implementation of the Needleman-Wunsch and Smith-Waterman algorithms. We have ported the MC64-NW/SW (originally developed for the Tile64 processor), to the x86 architecture (Intel Xeon Quad Core and Intel i7 Quad Core processors) with excellent results. Hence, the evolution of the x86-based architectures towards coprocessors like the Xeon Phi should represent significant performance improvements for bioinformatics.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The performance of the many-core Tile64 versus the multi-core Xeon x86 architecture on bioinformatics has been compared. We have used the pairwise algorithm MC64-NW/SW that we have previously developed to align nucleic acid (DNA and RNA) and peptide (protein) sequences for the benchmarking, being an enhanced and parallel implementation of the Needleman-Wunsch and Smith-Waterman algorithms. We have ported the MC64-NW/SW (originally developed for the Tile64 processor), to the x86 architecture (Intel Xeon Quad Core and Intel i7 Quad Core processors) with excellent results. Hence, the evolution of the x86-based architectures towards coprocessors like the Xeon Phi should represent significant performance improvements for bioinformatics.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The performance of the many-core Tile64 versus the multi-core Xeon x86 architecture on bioinformatics has been compared. We have used the pairwise algorithm MC64-NW/SW that we have previously developed to align nucleic acid (DNA and RNA) and peptide (protein) sequences for the benchmarking, being an enhanced and parallel implementation of the Needleman-Wunsch and Smith-Waterman algorithms. We have ported the MC64-NW/SW (originally developed for the Tile64 processor), to the x86 architecture (Intel Xeon Quad Core and Intel i7 Quad Core processors) with excellent results. Hence, the evolution of the x86-based architectures towards coprocessors like the Xeon Phi should represent significant performance improvements for bioinformatics.

Key concepts: Xeon Phi, x86, Porting, Xeon, Computer science, Parallel computing, Coprocessor, Benchmarking

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Bioinformatics Performance Comparison of Many-core Tile64 vs. Multi-core Intel Xeon — Research Paper | ScholarLens