1998Unpublished venueRequires access

Countering Nuclear Weapons of Mass Destruction: Are We Doing Enough?

Lance A. Moore

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract : Countering nuclear fissile material leakage from the former Soviet Union should be the First National Security Priority of the United States. This problem is here today, and we must be prepared to deal with it now and in the future. It is simply not going to go away with time. Once these nuclear weapons and weapons-useable nuclear materials have dispersed to the possession of Third World rogue states, there is not much we can do to prevent their usage in a regional setting by U.S. Military means. This study discusses national policy and military options available to counter hostile countries nuclear weapons before and after use. There are no clear cut policies and easy military means for neutralizing nuclear weapons in the most likely scenarios. Therefore, The U.S. National Command Authority should consider the framework of these policy and military options in countering nuclear weapons of mass destruction in the future.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract : Countering nuclear fissile material leakage from the former Soviet Union should be the First National Security Priority of the United States. This problem is here today, and we must be prepared to deal with it now and in the future. It is simply not going to go away with time. Once these nuclear weapons and weapons-useable nuclear materials have dispersed to the possession of Third World rogue states, there is not much we can do to prevent their usage in a regional setting by U.S. Military means. This study discusses national policy and military options available to counter hostile countries nuclear weapons before and after use. There are no clear cut policies and easy military means for neutralizing nuclear weapons in the most likely scenarios. Therefore, The U.S. National Command Authority should consider the framework of these policy and military options in countering nuclear weapons of mass destruction in the future.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract : Countering nuclear fissile material leakage from the former Soviet Union should be the First National Security Priority of the United States. This problem is here today, and we must be prepared to deal with it now and in the future. It is simply not going to go away with time. Once these nuclear weapons and weapons-useable nuclear materials have dispersed to the possession of Third World rogue states, there is not much we can do to prevent their usage in a regional setting by U.S. Military means. This study discusses national policy and military options available to counter hostile countries nuclear weapons before and after use. There are no clear cut policies and easy military means for neutralizing nuclear weapons in the most likely scenarios. Therefore, The U.S. National Command Authority should consider the framework of these policy and military options in countering nuclear weapons of mass destruction in the future.

Key concepts: Nuclear weapon, Computer security, Nuclear engineering, Computer science, Political science, Engineering, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Countering Nuclear Weapons of Mass Destruction: Are We Doing Enough? — Research Paper | ScholarLens