2014DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Requires access

C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Levels in Early Diagnosis of Neonatal Sepsis

Tariq Saeed, Muhammad Yasir Zahoor, Ul Haq, Fazal‐e‐Rabi Subhani, Rubina Zulfiqar, Tariq Mahmood, Raja Raja

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Background: To determine the validity of CRP in the early diagnosis of neonatal sepsis, keeping blood culture as gold standard. Patients and Methods: In this cross sectional study 373 full term neonates of either gender, suspected of having sepsis were included. Blood samples of these patients were collected for C-reactive protein and blood culture. The results of CRP were validated by blood culture findings. Results: CRP was found to be positive in 101 cases. Blood culture was positive in 226 cases. The main organisms isolated were Acinetobacter, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas and Proteus. The sensitivity and specificity of CRP were 45.0% and 65.1% respectively while the Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive Value were 66.0% and 44.1%, respectively. Conclusion: C-reactive protein is an inexpensive and simple test to perform. Sensitivity of C- reactive was detected to be low.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: To determine the validity of CRP in the early diagnosis of neonatal sepsis, keeping blood culture as gold standard. Patients and Methods: In this cross sectional study 373 full term neonates of either gender, suspected of having sepsis were included. Blood samples of these patients were collected for C-reactive protein and blood culture. The results of CRP were validated by blood culture findings. Results: CRP was found to be positive in 101 cases. Blood culture was positive in 226 cases. The main organisms isolated were Acinetobacter, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas and Proteus. The sensitivity and specificity of CRP were 45.0% and 65.1% respectively while the Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive Value were 66.0% and 44.1%, respectively. Conclusion: C-reactive protein is an inexpensive and simple test to perform. Sensitivity of C- reactive was detected to be low.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: To determine the validity of CRP in the early diagnosis of neonatal sepsis, keeping blood culture as gold standard. Patients and Methods: In this cross sectional study 373 full term neonates of either gender, suspected of having sepsis were included. Blood samples of these patients were collected for C-reactive protein and blood culture. The results of CRP were validated by blood culture findings. Results: CRP was found to be positive in 101 cases. Blood culture was positive in 226 cases. The main organisms isolated were Acinetobacter, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas and Proteus. The sensitivity and specificity of CRP were 45.0% and 65.1% respectively while the Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive Value were 66.0% and 44.1%, respectively. Conclusion: C-reactive protein is an inexpensive and simple test to perform. Sensitivity of C- reactive was detected to be low.

Key concepts: Blood culture, Neonatal sepsis, Sepsis, Medicine, C-reactive protein, Staphylococcus aureus, Gold standard (test), Predictive value

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Levels in Early Diagnosis of Neonatal Sepsis — Research Paper | ScholarLens