INFORMAL INFERENTIAL REASONING
Maxine Pfannkuch
Abstract
Maxine Pfannkuch
Abstract
Year 11 (15-year-old) students are not exposed to formal statistical inferential methods. Therefore, when drawing conclusions from data, their reasoning must be based mainly on looking at graph representations. This study investigates the type of reasoning that might develop students’ informal inferential statistical reasoning towards a more formal level. A perspectives model is developed for a teacher’s informal inferential reasoning from the comparison of boxplots. The model is then used to analyse her students’ responses to an assessment task. The resultant analysis produced a conjectured hierarchical model for students’ reasoning. The implications of the findings for instruction are discussed.
OpenAlex reports 47 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Year 11 (15-year-old) students are not exposed to formal statistical inferential methods. Therefore, when drawing conclusions from data, their reasoning must be based mainly on looking at graph representations. This study investigates the type of reasoning that might develop students’ informal inferential statistical reasoning towards a more formal level. A perspectives model is developed for a teacher’s informal inferential reasoning from the comparison of boxplots. The model is then used to analyse her students’ responses to an assessment task. The resultant analysis produced a conjectured hierarchical model for students’ reasoning. The implications of the findings for instruction are discussed.
Key concepts: Verbal reasoning, Statistical inference, Task (project management), Computer science, Inference, Qualitative reasoning, Mathematics education, Psychology