2005Unpublished venueRequires access

Estudios para evaluar el hierro corporal Studies for evaluation of body iron

Marta Elena Roque, Christian Jorge Gatti, Marta Elena Roque

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT ABSTRACT ABSTRACT Objetive: Multi-parameter studies combining serum Transferrin Receptor (sTfR) with Ferritin, hemoglobin, Objetive: Multi-parameter studies combining serum Transferrin Receptor (sTfR) with Ferritin, hemoglobin, Objetive: Multi-parameter studies combining serum Transferrin Receptor (sTfR) with Ferritin, hemoglobin, Objetive: Multi-parameter studies combining serum Transferrin Receptor (sTfR) with Ferritin, hemoglobin, Objetive: Multi-parameter studies combining serum Transferrin Receptor (sTfR) with Ferritin, hemoglobin, transferrin saturation percentage for an assessment of iron status. Materials and Methods.Subjects: transferrin saturation percentage for an assessment of iron status. Materials and Methods.Subjects: transferrin saturation percentage for an assessment of iron status. Materials and Methods.Subjects: transferrin saturation percentage for an assessment of iron status. Materials and Methods.Subjects: transferrin saturation percentage for an assessment of iron status. Materials and Methods.Subjects: Healthy Adults (HA)(n=51) and Iron-Deficient Anemic Patients (IDAP) (n=50). sTfR and Ferritin were Healthy Adults (HA)(n=51) and Iron-Deficient Anemic Patients (IDAP) (n=50). sTfR and Ferritin were Healthy Adults (HA)(n=51) and Iron-Deficient Anemic Patients (IDAP) (n=50). sTfR and Ferritin were Healthy Adults (HA)(n=51) and Iron-Deficient Anemic Patients (IDAP) (n=50). sTfR and Ferritin were Healthy Adults (HA)(n=51) and Iron-Deficient Anemic Patients (IDAP) (n=50). sTfR and Ferritin were measured by ELISA. Results: Mean confidence interval IC95( measured by ELISA. Results: Mean confidence interval IC95( measured by ELISA. Results: Mean confidence interval IC95( measured by ELISA. Results: Mean confidence interval IC95( measured by ELISA. Results: Mean confidence interval IC95(µ µ µ µ µ) showed that the mean value for sTfR ) showed that the mean value for sTfR ) showed that the mean value for sTfR ) showed that the mean value for sTfR ) 0.05), and the sTfR/F Index (75.8) were greater than in HA (5% significance level). TfR/Hb (p<0.001), 71% (r2), and Ferritin/Hb (p<0.001), 70 % (r2), showed that for Hb <120g/ level). TfR/Hb (p<0.001), 71% (r2), and Ferritin/Hb (p<0.001), 70 % (r2), showed that for Hb <120g/ level). TfR/Hb (p<0.001), 71% (r2), and Ferritin/Hb (p<0.001), 70 % (r2), showed that for Hb <120g/ level). TfR/Hb (p<0.001), 71% (r2), and Ferritin/Hb (p<0.001), 70 % (r2), showed that for Hb <120g/ level). TfR/Hb (p<0.001), 71% (r2), and Ferritin/Hb (p<0.001), 70 % (r2), showed that for Hb <120g/ L, sTfR is more sensitive than Ferritin. sTfR/Ferritin (p<0.001), 72% (r2) showed significant sTfR L, sTfR is more sensitive than Ferritin. sTfR/Ferritin (p<0.001), 72% (r2) showed significant sTfR L, sTfR is more sensitive than Ferritin. sTfR/Ferritin (p<0.001), 72% (r2) showed significant sTfR L, sTfR is more sensitive than Ferritin. sTfR/Ferritin (p<0.001), 72% (r2) showed significant sTfR L, sTfR is more sensitive than Ferritin. sTfR/Ferritin (p<0.001), 72% (r2) showed significant sTfR increases for ferritins <12µg/L. Conclusion: Our studies confirm that the sTfR detects iron-sensitive increases for ferritins <12µg/L. Conclusion: Our studies confirm that the sTfR detects iron-sensitive increases for ferritins <12µg/L. Conclusion: Our studies confirm that the sTfR detects iron-sensitive increases for ferritins <12µg/L. Conclusion: Our studies confirm that the sTfR detects iron-sensitive increases for ferritins <12µg/L. Conclusion: Our studies confirm that the sTfR detects iron-sensitive changes with a diagnostic accuracy. The combined use of sTfR and conventional parameters allows for changes with a diagnostic accuracy. The combined use of sTfR and conventional parameters allows for changes with a diagnostic accuracy. The combined use of sTfR and conventional parameters allows for changes with a diagnostic accuracy. The combined use of sTfR and conventional parameters allows for changes with a diagnostic accuracy. The combined use of sTfR and conventional parameters allows for easier iron status assessment. easier iron status assessment. easier iron status assessment. easier iron status assessment. easier iron status assessment.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

ABSTRACT ABSTRACT ABSTRACT Objetive: Multi-parameter studies combining serum Transferrin Receptor (sTfR) with Ferritin, hemoglobin, Objetive: Multi-parameter studies combining serum Transferrin Receptor (sTfR) with Ferritin, hemoglobin, Objetive: Multi-parameter studies combining serum Transferrin Receptor (sTfR) with Ferritin, hemoglobin, Objetive: Multi-parameter studies combining serum Transferrin Receptor (sTfR) with Ferritin, hemoglobin, Objetive: Multi-parameter studies combining serum Transferrin Receptor (sTfR) with Ferritin, hemoglobin, transferrin saturation percentage for an assessment of iron status. Materials and Methods.Subjects: transferrin saturation percentage for an assessment of iron status. Materials and Methods.Subjects: transferrin saturation percentage for an assessment of iron status. Materials and Methods.Subjects: transferrin saturation percentage for an assessment of iron status. Materials and Methods.Subjects: transferrin saturation percentage for an assessment of iron status. Materials and Methods.Subjects: Healthy Adults (HA)(n=51) and Iron-Deficient Anemic Patients (IDAP) (n=50). sTfR and Ferritin were Healthy Adults (HA)(n=51) and Iron-Deficient Anemic Patients (IDAP) (n=50). sTfR and Ferritin were Healthy Adults (HA)(n=51) and Iron-Deficient Anemic Patients (IDAP) (n=50). sTfR and Ferritin were Healthy Adults (HA)(n=51) and Iron-Deficient Anemic Patients (IDAP) (n=50). sTfR and Ferritin were Healthy Adults (HA)(n=51) and Iron-Deficient Anemic Patients (IDAP) (n=50). sTfR and Ferritin were measured by ELISA. Results: Mean confidence interval IC95( measured by ELISA. Results: Mean confidence interval IC95( measured by ELISA. Results: Mean confidence interval IC95( measured by ELISA. Results: Mean confidence interval IC95( measured by ELISA. Results: Mean confidence interval IC95(µ µ µ µ µ) showed that the mean value for sTfR ) showed that the mean value for sTfR ) showed that the mean value for sTfR ) showed that the mean value for sTfR ) 0.05), and the sTfR/F Index (75.8) were greater than in HA (5% significance level). TfR/Hb (p<0.001), 71% (r2), and Ferritin/Hb (p<0.001), 70 % (r2), showed that for Hb <120g/ level). TfR/Hb (p<0.001), 71% (r2), and Ferritin/Hb (p<0.001), 70 % (r2), showed that for Hb <120g/ level). TfR/Hb (p<0.001), 71% (r2), and Ferritin/Hb (p<0.001), 70 % (r2), showed that for Hb <120g/ level). TfR/Hb (p<0.001), 71% (r2), and Ferritin/Hb (p<0.001), 70 % (r2), showed that for Hb <120g/ level). TfR/Hb (p<0.001), 71% (r2), and Ferritin/Hb (p<0.001), 70 % (r2), showed that for Hb <120g/ L, sTfR is more sensitive than Ferritin. sTfR/Ferritin (p<0.001), 72% (r2) showed significant sTfR L, sTfR is more sensitive than Ferritin. sTfR/Ferritin (p<0.001), 72% (r2) showed significant sTfR L, sTfR is more sensitive than Ferritin. sTfR/Ferritin (p<0.001), 72% (r2) showed significant sTfR L, sTfR is more sensitive than Ferritin. sTfR/Ferritin (p<0.001), 72% (r2) showed significant sTfR L, sTfR is more sensitive than Ferritin. sTfR/Ferritin (p<0.001), 72% (r2) showed significant sTfR increases for ferritins <12µg/L. Conclusion: Our studies confirm that the sTfR detects iron-sensitive increases for ferritins <12µg/L. Conclusion: Our studies confirm that the sTfR detects iron-sensitive increases for ferritins <12µg/L. Conclusion: Our studies confirm that the sTfR detects iron-sensitive increases for ferritins <12µg/L. Conclusion: Our studies confirm that the sTfR detects iron-sensitive increases for ferritins <12µg/L. Conclusion: Our studies confirm that the sTfR detects iron-sensitive changes with a diagnostic accuracy. The combined use of sTfR and conventional parameters allows for changes with a diagnostic accuracy. The combined use of sTfR and conventional parameters allows for changes with a diagnostic accuracy. The combined use of sTfR and conventional parameters allows for changes with a diagnostic accuracy. The combined use of sTfR and conventional parameters allows for changes with a diagnostic accuracy. The combined use of sTfR and conventional parameters allows for easier iron status assessment. easier iron status assessment. easier iron status assessment. easier iron status assessment. easier iron status assessment.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

ABSTRACT ABSTRACT ABSTRACT Objetive: Multi-parameter studies combining serum Transferrin Receptor (sTfR) with Ferritin, hemoglobin, Objetive: Multi-parameter studies combining serum Transferrin Receptor (sTfR) with Ferritin, hemoglobin, Objetive: Multi-parameter studies combining serum Transferrin Receptor (sTfR) with Ferritin, hemoglobin, Objetive: Multi-parameter studies combining serum Transferrin Receptor (sTfR) with Ferritin, hemoglobin, Objetive: Multi-parameter studies combining serum Transferrin Receptor (sTfR) with Ferritin, hemoglobin, transferrin saturation percentage for an assessment of iron status. Materials and Methods.Subjects: transferrin saturation percentage for an assessment of iron status. Materials and Methods.Subjects: transferrin saturation percentage for an assessment of iron status. Materials and Methods.Subjects: transferrin saturation percentage for an assessment of iron status. Materials and Methods.Subjects: transferrin saturation percentage for an assessment of iron status. Materials and Methods.Subjects: Healthy Adults (HA)(n=51) and Iron-Deficient Anemic Patients (IDAP) (n=50). sTfR and Ferritin were Healthy Adults (HA)(n=51) and Iron-Deficient Anemic Patients (IDAP) (n=50). sTfR and Ferritin were Healthy Adults (HA)(n=51) and Iron-Deficient Anemic Patients (IDAP) (n=50). sTfR and Ferritin were Healthy Adults (HA)(n=51) and Iron-Deficient Anemic Patients (IDAP) (n=50). sTfR and Ferritin were Healthy Adults (HA)(n=51) and Iron-Deficient Anemic Patients (IDAP) (n=50). sTfR and Ferritin were measured by ELISA. Results: Mean confidence interval IC95( measured by ELISA. Results: Mean confidence interval IC95( measured by ELISA. Results: Mean confidence interval IC95( measured by ELISA. Results: Mean confidence interval IC95( measured by ELISA. Results: Mean confidence interval IC95(µ µ µ µ µ) showed that the mean value for sTfR ) showed that the mean value for sTfR ) showed that the mean value for sTfR ) showed that the mean value for sTfR ) 0.05), and the sTfR/F Index (75.8) were greater than in HA (5% significance level). TfR/Hb (p<0.001), 71% (r2), and Ferritin/Hb (p<0.001), 70 % (r2), showed that for Hb <120g/ level). TfR/Hb (p<0.001), 71% (r2), and Ferritin/Hb (p<0.001), 70 % (r2), showed that for Hb <120g/ level). TfR/Hb (p<0.001), 71% (r2), and Ferritin/Hb (p<0.001), 70 % (r2), showed that for Hb <120g/ level). TfR/Hb (p<0.001), 71% (r2), and Ferritin/Hb (p<0.001), 70 % (r2), showed that for Hb <120g/ level). TfR/Hb (p<0.001), 71% (r2), and Ferritin/Hb (p<0.001), 70 % (r2), showed that for Hb <120g/ L, sTfR is more sensitive than Ferritin. sTfR/Ferritin (p<0.001), 72% (r2) showed significant sTfR L, sTfR is more sensitive than Ferritin. sTfR/Ferritin (p<0.001), 72% (r2) showed significant sTfR L, sTfR is more sensitive than Ferritin. sTfR/Ferritin (p<0.001), 72% (r2) showed significant sTfR L, sTfR is more sensitive than Ferritin. sTfR/Ferritin (p<0.001), 72% (r2) showed significant sTfR L, sTfR is more sensitive than Ferritin. sTfR/Ferritin (p<0.001), 72% (r2) showed significant sTfR increases for ferritins <12µg/L. Conclusion: Our studies confirm that the sTfR detects iron-sensitive increases for ferritins <12µg/L. Conclusion: Our studies confirm that the sTfR detects iron-sensitive increases for ferritins <12µg/L. Conclusion: Our studies confirm that the sTfR detects iron-sensitive increases for ferritins <12µg/L. Conclusion: Our studies confirm that the sTfR detects iron-sensitive increases for ferritins <12µg/L. Conclusion: Our studies confirm that the sTfR detects iron-sensitive changes with a diagnostic accuracy. The combined use of sTfR and conventional parameters allows for changes with a diagnostic accuracy. The combined use of sTfR and conventional parameters allows for changes with a diagnostic accuracy. The combined use of sTfR and conventional parameters allows for changes with a diagnostic accuracy. The combined use of sTfR and conventional parameters allows for changes with a diagnostic accuracy. The combined use of sTfR and conventional parameters allows for easier iron status assessment. easier iron status assessment. easier iron status assessment. easier iron status assessment. easier iron status assessment.

Key concepts: Soluble transferrin receptor, Ferritin, Transferrin saturation, Transferrin, Hemoglobin, Confidence interval, Serum iron, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Estudios para evaluar el hierro corporal Studies for evaluation of body iron — Research Paper | ScholarLens