2013NDSU Repository (North Dakota State University)Open access

Cover crops impact on energy and forage crops productivity in North Dakota

Dulan Samarappuli

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Forage crops have gained interest as potential source of lignocellulosic feedstock to produce ethanol. More focus is needed on developing cropping systems to improve productivity. This study was conducted to identify the agronomic potential of six different cover crops on five different annual biomass crops. Results indicated that forage pea (Pisum sativum L. cv. Arvika) N uptake was 126 kg N ha-1 and was able to fix approximately 60 kg of N ha-1 in only 60 days in the fall. Results across locations indicated that forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench cv. FS-5), and sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench cv. Theis) had the highest biomass yields among the forage crops with 17.8 Mg ha-1 followed by sweet sorghum with 15.3 Mg ha-1, respectively. Therefore forage sorghum and sweet sorghum can be considered as the most productive biomass sources, specially combined with a legume cover crop seeded the previous fall.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Forage crops have gained interest as potential source of lignocellulosic feedstock to produce ethanol. More focus is needed on developing cropping systems to improve productivity. This study was conducted to identify the agronomic potential of six different cover crops on five different annual biomass crops. Results indicated that forage pea (Pisum sativum L. cv. Arvika) N uptake was 126 kg N ha-1 and was able to fix approximately 60 kg of N ha-1 in only 60 days in the fall. Results across locations indicated that forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench cv. FS-5), and sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench cv. Theis) had the highest biomass yields among the forage crops with 17.8 Mg ha-1 followed by sweet sorghum with 15.3 Mg ha-1, respectively. Therefore forage sorghum and sweet sorghum can be considered as the most productive biomass sources, specially combined with a legume cover crop seeded the previous fall.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Forage crops have gained interest as potential source of lignocellulosic feedstock to produce ethanol. More focus is needed on developing cropping systems to improve productivity. This study was conducted to identify the agronomic potential of six different cover crops on five different annual biomass crops. Results indicated that forage pea (Pisum sativum L. cv. Arvika) N uptake was 126 kg N ha-1 and was able to fix approximately 60 kg of N ha-1 in only 60 days in the fall. Results across locations indicated that forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench cv. FS-5), and sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench cv. Theis) had the highest biomass yields among the forage crops with 17.8 Mg ha-1 followed by sweet sorghum with 15.3 Mg ha-1, respectively. Therefore forage sorghum and sweet sorghum can be considered as the most productive biomass sources, specially combined with a legume cover crop seeded the previous fall.

Key concepts: Sorghum, Agronomy, Forage, Sweet sorghum, Sativum, Biomass (ecology), Crop, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cover crops impact on energy and forage crops productivity in North Dakota — Research Paper | ScholarLens