2006Unpublished venueRequires access

A Formal Economic Theory for Happiness Studies: A Solution to the Happiness-Income Puzzle ⁄

Guoqiang Tian, Liyan Yang

Open publisher page 10 citations

Abstract

This paper develops a formal and rigorous economic theory that provides a micro foundation for studying happiness from the perspectives of social happiness maximization and pursuit of individual self-interest, and can be especially used to study a paradox at the heart of our lives: average happiness levels do not increase as countries grow wealthier. The theory, which takes into account both income factors and non-income factors, integrates the existing reference group theory and the \omitted variables theory, and identifles a fundamental con∞ict between individual and social welfare/happiness. We show that, up to a critical income level that is positively related to non-material status, increase in income enhances happiness. Once the critical income level is achieved, increase in income cannot increase social happiness and in fact, somewhat surprising, social happiness actually decreases, resulting in Pareto ine‐cient outcomes. A policy implication of our model is that government should promote income and non-income status in a balanced way by increasing public expenses on non-material wants such as mental status, family life, health, basic human rights, etc. when national income becomes relatively large. Our empirical results conflrm the implication and are robust across the countries under consideration.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper develops a formal and rigorous economic theory that provides a micro foundation for studying happiness from the perspectives of social happiness maximization and pursuit of individual self-interest, and can be especially used to study a paradox at the heart of our lives: average happiness levels do not increase as countries grow wealthier. The theory, which takes into account both income factors and non-income factors, integrates the existing reference group theory and the \omitted variables theory, and identifles a fundamental con∞ict between individual and social welfare/happiness. We show that, up to a critical income level that is positively related to non-material status, increase in income enhances happiness. Once the critical income level is achieved, increase in income cannot increase social happiness and in fact, somewhat surprising, social happiness actually decreases, resulting in Pareto ine‐cient outcomes. A policy implication of our model is that government should promote income and non-income status in a balanced way by increasing public expenses on non-material wants such as mental status, family life, health, basic human rights, etc. when national income becomes relatively large. Our empirical results conflrm the implication and are robust across the countries under consideration.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper develops a formal and rigorous economic theory that provides a micro foundation for studying happiness from the perspectives of social happiness maximization and pursuit of individual self-interest, and can be especially used to study a paradox at the heart of our lives: average happiness levels do not increase as countries grow wealthier. The theory, which takes into account both income factors and non-income factors, integrates the existing reference group theory and the \omitted variables theory, and identifles a fundamental con∞ict between individual and social welfare/happiness. We show that, up to a critical income level that is positively related to non-material status, increase in income enhances happiness. Once the critical income level is achieved, increase in income cannot increase social happiness and in fact, somewhat surprising, social happiness actually decreases, resulting in Pareto ine‐cient outcomes. A policy implication of our model is that government should promote income and non-income status in a balanced way by increasing public expenses on non-material wants such as mental status, family life, health, basic human rights, etc. when national income becomes relatively large. Our empirical results conflrm the implication and are robust across the countries under consideration.

Key concepts: Happiness, Economics, Life satisfaction, Government (linguistics), Public economics, Demographic economics, Social psychology, Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Formal Economic Theory for Happiness Studies: A Solution to the Happiness-Income Puzzle ⁄ — Research Paper | ScholarLens