2005PubMedRequires access

Expanded treatment of hepatic tumors with radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation.

Sharon M. Weber, Fred T. Lee

Open publisher page 28 citations

Abstract

Three definitive treatment options are available for patients with hepatic tumors: hepatic resection, tumor ablation, and hepatic transplantation. Ablative techniques--including radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and cryoablation--have greatly improved physicians' ability to definitively treat patients with primary and secondary hepatic tumors. Both RFA and cryoablation are safe and well-tolerated, but the effectiveness for local tumor eradication depends on many factors, including tumor size, location, number, and type. The choice of ablation modality is based on user and institutional biases. Assessing outcome after ablation is difficult because few studies with good long-term follow-up have evaluated local recurrence, disease-free survival, and overall survival after ablation. This and other limitations make it difficult to draw meaningful conclusions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Three definitive treatment options are available for patients with hepatic tumors: hepatic resection, tumor ablation, and hepatic transplantation. Ablative techniques--including radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and cryoablation--have greatly improved physicians' ability to definitively treat patients with primary and secondary hepatic tumors. Both RFA and cryoablation are safe and well-tolerated, but the effectiveness for local tumor eradication depends on many factors, including tumor size, location, number, and type. The choice of ablation modality is based on user and institutional biases. Assessing outcome after ablation is difficult because few studies with good long-term follow-up have evaluated local recurrence, disease-free survival, and overall survival after ablation. This and other limitations make it difficult to draw meaningful conclusions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 28 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Three definitive treatment options are available for patients with hepatic tumors: hepatic resection, tumor ablation, and hepatic transplantation. Ablative techniques--including radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and cryoablation--have greatly improved physicians' ability to definitively treat patients with primary and secondary hepatic tumors. Both RFA and cryoablation are safe and well-tolerated, but the effectiveness for local tumor eradication depends on many factors, including tumor size, location, number, and type. The choice of ablation modality is based on user and institutional biases. Assessing outcome after ablation is difficult because few studies with good long-term follow-up have evaluated local recurrence, disease-free survival, and overall survival after ablation. This and other limitations make it difficult to draw meaningful conclusions.

Key concepts: Cryoablation, Radiofrequency ablation, Ablation, Medicine, Ablative case, Cryosurgery, Radiology, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Expanded treatment of hepatic tumors with radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation. — Research Paper | ScholarLens