2013Unpublished venueRequires access

Input Price Discrimination and Social Welfare in the Presence of Technology Licensing

Kuo‐Feng Kao, Hong Hwang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The literature on input price discrimination has shown that third-degree price discrimination by an upstream firm is welfare-deteriorating as the upstream firm charges more (less) efficient downstream firms a higher (lower) input price which distorts the production efficiency. (See, for example, Katz (1987) and DeGraba (1990)) In this paper, we examine the welfare effect of third-degree input price discrimination in the presence of technology licensing by an outside innovator in a vertically related market with one upstream monopolist and n homogeneous downstream oligopolists. It is found that the innovator tends to license its technology to more downstream firms if the upstream firm engages in discriminatory pricing. This improves the overall production efficiency of the downstream firms and makes discriminatory pricing more socially desirable than uniform pricing, which is opposite to the general outcome in the literature.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The literature on input price discrimination has shown that third-degree price discrimination by an upstream firm is welfare-deteriorating as the upstream firm charges more (less) efficient downstream firms a higher (lower) input price which distorts the production efficiency. (See, for example, Katz (1987) and DeGraba (1990)) In this paper, we examine the welfare effect of third-degree input price discrimination in the presence of technology licensing by an outside innovator in a vertically related market with one upstream monopolist and n homogeneous downstream oligopolists. It is found that the innovator tends to license its technology to more downstream firms if the upstream firm engages in discriminatory pricing. This improves the overall production efficiency of the downstream firms and makes discriminatory pricing more socially desirable than uniform pricing, which is opposite to the general outcome in the literature.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The literature on input price discrimination has shown that third-degree price discrimination by an upstream firm is welfare-deteriorating as the upstream firm charges more (less) efficient downstream firms a higher (lower) input price which distorts the production efficiency. (See, for example, Katz (1987) and DeGraba (1990)) In this paper, we examine the welfare effect of third-degree input price discrimination in the presence of technology licensing by an outside innovator in a vertically related market with one upstream monopolist and n homogeneous downstream oligopolists. It is found that the innovator tends to license its technology to more downstream firms if the upstream firm engages in discriminatory pricing. This improves the overall production efficiency of the downstream firms and makes discriminatory pricing more socially desirable than uniform pricing, which is opposite to the general outcome in the literature.

Key concepts: Upstream (networking), Price discrimination, Downstream (manufacturing), License, Innovator, Microeconomics, Production (economics), Social Welfare

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Input Price Discrimination and Social Welfare in the Presence of Technology Licensing — Research Paper | ScholarLens