2015Unpublished venueRequires access

On the effectiveness of using midterm examinations strictly for formative feedback

Robert M. O’Connell

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Research shows that, when it is conducted properly, formative assessment can have a significant impact on student learning. Examinations administered throughout the course, defined here as midterm exams, can be used effectively for formative assessment. However, misconceptions about the differences between the purposes of formative and summative assessment often lead to faulty application of midterm exams for summative assessment. The purposes of this paper are to clarify the pedagogical differences between exams used for formative and summative purposes, and to present data that illustrate that when midterm exams are used strictly for formative purposes, they can significantly enhance student learning, as measured by student performance on summative final examinations.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Research shows that, when it is conducted properly, formative assessment can have a significant impact on student learning. Examinations administered throughout the course, defined here as midterm exams, can be used effectively for formative assessment. However, misconceptions about the differences between the purposes of formative and summative assessment often lead to faulty application of midterm exams for summative assessment. The purposes of this paper are to clarify the pedagogical differences between exams used for formative and summative purposes, and to present data that illustrate that when midterm exams are used strictly for formative purposes, they can significantly enhance student learning, as measured by student performance on summative final examinations.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Research shows that, when it is conducted properly, formative assessment can have a significant impact on student learning. Examinations administered throughout the course, defined here as midterm exams, can be used effectively for formative assessment. However, misconceptions about the differences between the purposes of formative and summative assessment often lead to faulty application of midterm exams for summative assessment. The purposes of this paper are to clarify the pedagogical differences between exams used for formative and summative purposes, and to present data that illustrate that when midterm exams are used strictly for formative purposes, they can significantly enhance student learning, as measured by student performance on summative final examinations.

Key concepts: Formative assessment, Summative assessment, Knowledge survey, Computer science, Mathematics education, Medical education, Psychology, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
On the effectiveness of using midterm examinations strictly for formative feedback — Research Paper | ScholarLens