2011Medical Journal of BabylonRequires access

M J B Management of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injections

Jameel Tahseen Mehsen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Degenerative lumbar stenosis is a common source of pain and disability in middle age and elderly. It presents clinically with a variety of symptoms, though neurogenic claudication is the hallmark. There is a multifactorial pathogenesis to lumbar spinal stenosis and its symptoms. Epidural steroid injections are commonly utilized to help reduce radicular pain in lumbar spinal stenosis. It can be accomplished by one of three methods: caudal (C), interlaminar (IL), or transforaminal (TF). In this study we sought to determine the efficacy of fluoroscopically guided caudal and transforaminal epidural steroid injections for the management of radicular pain associated with lumbar spinal stenosis. The outcome measures of this study are patient satisfaction, pain relief, improved function and walking tolerance. Of 42 patients included in this study 71.4% of the patients had partial to complete pain relief at 1 month compared to 57.1% at 6 months and 45.2% at 12 months. 64.2% had full or improved function at 1 month compared to 50% at 6 months and 33.3% at 12 months. 66.6% of the patients were completely or somewhat satisfied at 1 month compared to 59.5% at 6 months and 38% at 12 months. When weighing the surgical alternatives and associated risk, cost, and outcomes, lumbar epidural steroid injections are a reasonable nonsurgical option in select patients especially in those patients who are unwilling to do surgery or in whom surgery is contraindicated.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Degenerative lumbar stenosis is a common source of pain and disability in middle age and elderly. It presents clinically with a variety of symptoms, though neurogenic claudication is the hallmark. There is a multifactorial pathogenesis to lumbar spinal stenosis and its symptoms. Epidural steroid injections are commonly utilized to help reduce radicular pain in lumbar spinal stenosis. It can be accomplished by one of three methods: caudal (C), interlaminar (IL), or transforaminal (TF). In this study we sought to determine the efficacy of fluoroscopically guided caudal and transforaminal epidural steroid injections for the management of radicular pain associated with lumbar spinal stenosis. The outcome measures of this study are patient satisfaction, pain relief, improved function and walking tolerance. Of 42 patients included in this study 71.4% of the patients had partial to complete pain relief at 1 month compared to 57.1% at 6 months and 45.2% at 12 months. 64.2% had full or improved function at 1 month compared to 50% at 6 months and 33.3% at 12 months. 66.6% of the patients were completely or somewhat satisfied at 1 month compared to 59.5% at 6 months and 38% at 12 months. When weighing the surgical alternatives and associated risk, cost, and outcomes, lumbar epidural steroid injections are a reasonable nonsurgical option in select patients especially in those patients who are unwilling to do surgery or in whom surgery is contraindicated.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Degenerative lumbar stenosis is a common source of pain and disability in middle age and elderly. It presents clinically with a variety of symptoms, though neurogenic claudication is the hallmark. There is a multifactorial pathogenesis to lumbar spinal stenosis and its symptoms. Epidural steroid injections are commonly utilized to help reduce radicular pain in lumbar spinal stenosis. It can be accomplished by one of three methods: caudal (C), interlaminar (IL), or transforaminal (TF). In this study we sought to determine the efficacy of fluoroscopically guided caudal and transforaminal epidural steroid injections for the management of radicular pain associated with lumbar spinal stenosis. The outcome measures of this study are patient satisfaction, pain relief, improved function and walking tolerance. Of 42 patients included in this study 71.4% of the patients had partial to complete pain relief at 1 month compared to 57.1% at 6 months and 45.2% at 12 months. 64.2% had full or improved function at 1 month compared to 50% at 6 months and 33.3% at 12 months. 66.6% of the patients were completely or somewhat satisfied at 1 month compared to 59.5% at 6 months and 38% at 12 months. When weighing the surgical alternatives and associated risk, cost, and outcomes, lumbar epidural steroid injections are a reasonable nonsurgical option in select patients especially in those patients who are unwilling to do surgery or in whom surgery is contraindicated.

Key concepts: Medicine, Radicular pain, Lumbar spinal stenosis, Neurogenic claudication, Lumbar, Surgery, Spinal stenosis, Epidural steroid injection

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
M J B Management of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injections — Research Paper | ScholarLens