2010Unpublished venueRequires access

Rewarding Energy Savings Rather than Energy Efficiency

Paolo Bertoldi, Silvia Rezessy, Benigna Boza‐Kiss

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Financial incentives are important for overcoming certain market barriers to improved energy efficiency and for the adoption of energy efficient technologies. Such incentives are mainly focused on the introduction of specific technologies, rather than behavioral change. While the declared goal of financial support schemes is to save energy or reduce harmful emissions rather than to foster new technologies per se, it is very often encountered that such financial support for energy efficient technologies may not ensure real energy savings due to the rebound effect and remaining barriers. In the area of renewable energies it is common for financial support to be given to power producers for the verified production of renewable electricity, in the form of a guaranteed financial incentive (feed-in tariff). In the energy efficiency policy research little attention has been paid to the possible use of a feed-in tariff (FIT), in the form of a financial incentive based on the kWh saved by the end-user. This paper discusses the possible setup of a FIT designed to reward real energy savings (ES FIT). The paper first explores the rationale behind and the possible functionality of an ES FIT, giving examples of similar policy tools implemented or planned. The paper looks into additionality and persistency of energy savings thus supported. Finally, key advantages and complexities related to a FIT scheme for energy savings are discussed, intending to open a discussion and foster further research on the topic.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Financial incentives are important for overcoming certain market barriers to improved energy efficiency and for the adoption of energy efficient technologies. Such incentives are mainly focused on the introduction of specific technologies, rather than behavioral change. While the declared goal of financial support schemes is to save energy or reduce harmful emissions rather than to foster new technologies per se, it is very often encountered that such financial support for energy efficient technologies may not ensure real energy savings due to the rebound effect and remaining barriers. In the area of renewable energies it is common for financial support to be given to power producers for the verified production of renewable electricity, in the form of a guaranteed financial incentive (feed-in tariff). In the energy efficiency policy research little attention has been paid to the possible use of a feed-in tariff (FIT), in the form of a financial incentive based on the kWh saved by the end-user. This paper discusses the possible setup of a FIT designed to reward real energy savings (ES FIT). The paper first explores the rationale behind and the possible functionality of an ES FIT, giving examples of similar policy tools implemented or planned. The paper looks into additionality and persistency of energy savings thus supported. Finally, key advantages and complexities related to a FIT scheme for energy savings are discussed, intending to open a discussion and foster further research on the topic.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Financial incentives are important for overcoming certain market barriers to improved energy efficiency and for the adoption of energy efficient technologies. Such incentives are mainly focused on the introduction of specific technologies, rather than behavioral change. While the declared goal of financial support schemes is to save energy or reduce harmful emissions rather than to foster new technologies per se, it is very often encountered that such financial support for energy efficient technologies may not ensure real energy savings due to the rebound effect and remaining barriers. In the area of renewable energies it is common for financial support to be given to power producers for the verified production of renewable electricity, in the form of a guaranteed financial incentive (feed-in tariff). In the energy efficiency policy research little attention has been paid to the possible use of a feed-in tariff (FIT), in the form of a financial incentive based on the kWh saved by the end-user. This paper discusses the possible setup of a FIT designed to reward real energy savings (ES FIT). The paper first explores the rationale behind and the possible functionality of an ES FIT, giving examples of similar policy tools implemented or planned. The paper looks into additionality and persistency of energy savings thus supported. Finally, key advantages and complexities related to a FIT scheme for energy savings are discussed, intending to open a discussion and foster further research on the topic.

Key concepts: Incentive, Tariff, Environmental economics, Renewable energy, Efficient energy use, Feed-in tariff, Additionality, Economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Rewarding Energy Savings Rather than Energy Efficiency — Research Paper | ScholarLens