2008•Unpublished venueRequires access

DYNAMICS OF FEDERAL RELATIONS IN PUTIN'S RUSSIA *

Seongjin Kim

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This study explores changing features of federal relations that has developed under Putin and their implications for the future political development in Russia. Federal relations have been one of the most popular topics of Russian studies, particularly in the early 1990s and in the 2000s. Since 1990, Russia conducted unintended experiment of applying both ‘extreme’ shapes of federalism: decentralized federalism between 1990 and 1993, and centralized one since 2000. After the collapse of the soviet system, research focus has shifted from the centre to peripheries. Since the early 1990s, increasing numbers of studies were conducted to examine regional politics and socio-economic and ethnic disparities. In particular, the republics’ challenge to Moscow’s domination attracted interests of researchers, partly because the relationship between Moscow and republics has been believed to constitute a basis of federalism in the soviet system. After Putin’s federal reform, however, the focus has shifted from the regions back to the centre, i.e., from the discourse of ‘strong regions’ to that of ‘strong centre’. Under Putin, centripetal forces dominate the dynamics of federal relations, which altered the main stream of Russian politics discourse from regionalization of reform to democracy in various fields of reform. A brief literature review also shows such changes. First, the degree of centripetal forces and the evaluation of centralization policy constitute a main part of discussion in the 2000s. To this question, a common understanding has been spreading that Putin’s policies have Seongjin Kim

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study explores changing features of federal relations that has developed under Putin and their implications for the future political development in Russia. Federal relations have been one of the most popular topics of Russian studies, particularly in the early 1990s and in the 2000s. Since 1990, Russia conducted unintended experiment of applying both ‘extreme’ shapes of federalism: decentralized federalism between 1990 and 1993, and centralized one since 2000. After the collapse of the soviet system, research focus has shifted from the centre to peripheries. Since the early 1990s, increasing numbers of studies were conducted to examine regional politics and socio-economic and ethnic disparities. In particular, the republics’ challenge to Moscow’s domination attracted interests of researchers, partly because the relationship between Moscow and republics has been believed to constitute a basis of federalism in the soviet system. After Putin’s federal reform, however, the focus has shifted from the regions back to the centre, i.e., from the discourse of ‘strong regions’ to that of ‘strong centre’. Under Putin, centripetal forces dominate the dynamics of federal relations, which altered the main stream of Russian politics discourse from regionalization of reform to democracy in various fields of reform. A brief literature review also shows such changes. First, the degree of centripetal forces and the evaluation of centralization policy constitute a main part of discussion in the 2000s. To this question, a common understanding has been spreading that Putin’s policies have Seongjin Kim

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study explores changing features of federal relations that has developed under Putin and their implications for the future political development in Russia. Federal relations have been one of the most popular topics of Russian studies, particularly in the early 1990s and in the 2000s. Since 1990, Russia conducted unintended experiment of applying both ‘extreme’ shapes of federalism: decentralized federalism between 1990 and 1993, and centralized one since 2000. After the collapse of the soviet system, research focus has shifted from the centre to peripheries. Since the early 1990s, increasing numbers of studies were conducted to examine regional politics and socio-economic and ethnic disparities. In particular, the republics’ challenge to Moscow’s domination attracted interests of researchers, partly because the relationship between Moscow and republics has been believed to constitute a basis of federalism in the soviet system. After Putin’s federal reform, however, the focus has shifted from the regions back to the centre, i.e., from the discourse of ‘strong regions’ to that of ‘strong centre’. Under Putin, centripetal forces dominate the dynamics of federal relations, which altered the main stream of Russian politics discourse from regionalization of reform to democracy in various fields of reform. A brief literature review also shows such changes. First, the degree of centripetal forces and the evaluation of centralization policy constitute a main part of discussion in the 2000s. To this question, a common understanding has been spreading that Putin’s policies have Seongjin Kim

Key concepts: Federalism, Political science, Politics, Unintended consequences, Political economy, Democracy, Centripetal force, Development economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
DYNAMICS OF FEDERAL RELATIONS IN PUTIN'S RUSSIA * — Research Paper | ScholarLens