2010Journal of Food Agriculture & EnvironmentRequires access

Genetic distance obtained by RAPD markers in common bean of the Carioca group.

Maria Celeste Gonçalves‐Vidigal, ANA CRISTINA GONÇALVES CEOLIN, Pedro Soares Vidigal Filho, Sônia Maria Alves Pinto Prioli, Giselly Figueiredo Lacanallo, Juliana Parisotto Poletine, Azeredo Gonçalves, Allan Klynger da Silva Lobato, Vanusa da Silva Ramos Martins

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The aim of this present study was to evaluate the genetic divergence among 18 common bean genotypes from Carioca group, by multivariate techniques based on 52 RAPD markers, in which 36.53% were polymorphic. Measures of genetic distance were obtained by using Roger’s Distance and evaluated through Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Mean (UPGMA), which clustered the genotypes into four groups and was efficient in placing elite lines into one group and cultivars into other ones. Princesa, Iapar 81 and EL 49 cultivars were the most divergent in relation to the others. The most similar lines were CNFC 8007 and CNFC 8008. Genotypes showed considerable genetic divergence, which is partly associated to the origin of genetic material in study. The results showed that there was enough genetic variability to be explored in common bean breeding programs in order to obtain superior segregant from Carioca group.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The aim of this present study was to evaluate the genetic divergence among 18 common bean genotypes from Carioca group, by multivariate techniques based on 52 RAPD markers, in which 36.53% were polymorphic. Measures of genetic distance were obtained by using Roger’s Distance and evaluated through Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Mean (UPGMA), which clustered the genotypes into four groups and was efficient in placing elite lines into one group and cultivars into other ones. Princesa, Iapar 81 and EL 49 cultivars were the most divergent in relation to the others. The most similar lines were CNFC 8007 and CNFC 8008. Genotypes showed considerable genetic divergence, which is partly associated to the origin of genetic material in study. The results showed that there was enough genetic variability to be explored in common bean breeding programs in order to obtain superior segregant from Carioca group.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The aim of this present study was to evaluate the genetic divergence among 18 common bean genotypes from Carioca group, by multivariate techniques based on 52 RAPD markers, in which 36.53% were polymorphic. Measures of genetic distance were obtained by using Roger’s Distance and evaluated through Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Mean (UPGMA), which clustered the genotypes into four groups and was efficient in placing elite lines into one group and cultivars into other ones. Princesa, Iapar 81 and EL 49 cultivars were the most divergent in relation to the others. The most similar lines were CNFC 8007 and CNFC 8008. Genotypes showed considerable genetic divergence, which is partly associated to the origin of genetic material in study. The results showed that there was enough genetic variability to be explored in common bean breeding programs in order to obtain superior segregant from Carioca group.

Key concepts: UPGMA, RAPD, Genetic distance, Genetic divergence, Biology, Cultivar, Genotype, Genetic variation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Genetic distance obtained by RAPD markers in common bean of the Carioca group. — Research Paper | ScholarLens