2003•Unpublished venueRequires access

PLANT PATHOLOGY AND NEMATOLOGY A Comparison of the Damage Functions, Root Galling, and Reproduction of Meloidogyne incognita on Resistant and Susceptible Cotton Cultivars

Enda Zhou, James L. Starr

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Nematode management decisions should be based, in part, on knowledge of the damage threshold population density, and this value is likely to vary based on the level of resistance of the cotton cultivar. The damage functions of two cotton cultivars resistant to the root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) were compared with that of a susceptible cultivar in field microplots using a 3 x 7 factorial design with three cultivars (susceptible Paymaster HS 260; resistant Acala NemX and Stoneville LA 887) and seven initial nematode population densities (Pi). Final nematode population densities and root gall indices were greater on the susceptible HS 26 than on the resistant cultivars (P ≤ 0.05). Seed cotton yields of all cultivars decreased with increasing nematode Pi (r 2 = 0.53 to 0.81), with relative yield losses being the greatest for HS 26. When yield responses to Pi were fitted to the Seinhorst model [Y = m + (1-m)Z P-T ], the damage thresholds for each cultivar were similar (T = 0.1 to 9 nematodes/500cm 3 soil). The minimum yield parameter was lower for the susceptible HS 26 (m = 0.71 to 0.8) than for the resistant cultivars (m = 0.8 to 0.93), but these differences were not significant (P ≥ 0.05). Based on both the regression and the Seinhorst models, the resistant cultivars have greater tolerance than the susceptible cultivar. The increased tolerance of the resistant cultivars increased the nematode density at which an action threshold for management is acheived.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Nematode management decisions should be based, in part, on knowledge of the damage threshold population density, and this value is likely to vary based on the level of resistance of the cotton cultivar. The damage functions of two cotton cultivars resistant to the root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) were compared with that of a susceptible cultivar in field microplots using a 3 x 7 factorial design with three cultivars (susceptible Paymaster HS 260; resistant Acala NemX and Stoneville LA 887) and seven initial nematode population densities (Pi). Final nematode population densities and root gall indices were greater on the susceptible HS 26 than on the resistant cultivars (P ≤ 0.05). Seed cotton yields of all cultivars decreased with increasing nematode Pi (r 2 = 0.53 to 0.81), with relative yield losses being the greatest for HS 26. When yield responses to Pi were fitted to the Seinhorst model [Y = m + (1-m)Z P-T ], the damage thresholds for each cultivar were similar (T = 0.1 to 9 nematodes/500cm 3 soil). The minimum yield parameter was lower for the susceptible HS 26 (m = 0.71 to 0.8) than for the resistant cultivars (m = 0.8 to 0.93), but these differences were not significant (P ≥ 0.05). Based on both the regression and the Seinhorst models, the resistant cultivars have greater tolerance than the susceptible cultivar. The increased tolerance of the resistant cultivars increased the nematode density at which an action threshold for management is acheived.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Nematode management decisions should be based, in part, on knowledge of the damage threshold population density, and this value is likely to vary based on the level of resistance of the cotton cultivar. The damage functions of two cotton cultivars resistant to the root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) were compared with that of a susceptible cultivar in field microplots using a 3 x 7 factorial design with three cultivars (susceptible Paymaster HS 260; resistant Acala NemX and Stoneville LA 887) and seven initial nematode population densities (Pi). Final nematode population densities and root gall indices were greater on the susceptible HS 26 than on the resistant cultivars (P ≤ 0.05). Seed cotton yields of all cultivars decreased with increasing nematode Pi (r 2 = 0.53 to 0.81), with relative yield losses being the greatest for HS 26. When yield responses to Pi were fitted to the Seinhorst model [Y = m + (1-m)Z P-T ], the damage thresholds for each cultivar were similar (T = 0.1 to 9 nematodes/500cm 3 soil). The minimum yield parameter was lower for the susceptible HS 26 (m = 0.71 to 0.8) than for the resistant cultivars (m = 0.8 to 0.93), but these differences were not significant (P ≥ 0.05). Based on both the regression and the Seinhorst models, the resistant cultivars have greater tolerance than the susceptible cultivar. The increased tolerance of the resistant cultivars increased the nematode density at which an action threshold for management is acheived.

Key concepts: Cultivar, Meloidogyne incognita, Biology, Nematode, Population, Terra incognita, Nematology, Rootstock

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
PLANT PATHOLOGY AND NEMATOLOGY A Comparison of the Damage Functions, Root Galling, and Reproduction of Meloidogyne incognita on Resistant and Susceptible Cotton Cultivars — Research Paper | ScholarLens