2014Unpublished venueRequires access

Energy Efficiency of Conservative Tillage Systems in the Hilly Areas of Romania

Teodor Rusu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Conservative tillage systems, specific to sustainable agriculture, require productivity at least equal to that of conventional technology, optimized energy efficiency and, at the same time, diminished environmental impact. An energy saving way is that of implementing optimal technology specific to each culture and pedoclimatic area. The minimum tillage and no-tillage systems represent alternatives to the conventional system of soil tillage, due to their conservation effects on soil features and to the assured productions, maize: 96-98.1% at minimum tillage and 99.8% at no-tillage, soybean: 102.9-111.9% at minimum tillage and 117.2% at no-tillage, wheat: 93.4-96.8% at minimum tillage and 106.9% at no-tillage, as compared to the conventional system. Correct choice of the right soil tillage system for the crops in rotation help reduce energy consumption, thus maize: 97.3-97.9% at minimum tillage and 91.3% at no-tillage, soybean: 98.6-98.2% at minimum tillage and 92.8% at no-tillage, wheat: 97.4-98% at minimum tillage and 91.6% at no-tillage. Energy efficiency is in relation to reductions in energy savings, but also with efficiency and impact on the tillage system on the cultivated plant. For all crops in rotation, energy efficiency (energy produced from 1 MJ consumed) was the best in no-tillage and 10.44 MJ ha at maize, 6.49 MJ ha at soybean, 5.66 MJ ha at wheat. Energy-efficient 11 1 agricultural system: the energy consumed-energy produced-energy yield, necessarily have to be supplemented by soil energy efficiency, with the conservative effect of the agricultural system. Only then the agricultural system will be sustainable, durable in agronomic, economic and ecological terms. The implementation of minimum and no-tillage soil systems have increased the organic matter content from 2 to 7.6% and water stabile aggregate content from 5.6 to 9.6%, at 0-30 cm depth, as compared to the conventional system. While the soil fertility and the wet aggregate stability have initially been low, the effect of conservation practices on the soil characteristics led to a positive impact on the water permeability in the soil. Availability of soil moisture during the crop growth led to a better plant watering condition. Subsequent release of conserved soil water regulated proper plant water condition and soil structure.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Conservative tillage systems, specific to sustainable agriculture, require productivity at least equal to that of conventional technology, optimized energy efficiency and, at the same time, diminished environmental impact. An energy saving way is that of implementing optimal technology specific to each culture and pedoclimatic area. The minimum tillage and no-tillage systems represent alternatives to the conventional system of soil tillage, due to their conservation effects on soil features and to the assured productions, maize: 96-98.1% at minimum tillage and 99.8% at no-tillage, soybean: 102.9-111.9% at minimum tillage and 117.2% at no-tillage, wheat: 93.4-96.8% at minimum tillage and 106.9% at no-tillage, as compared to the conventional system. Correct choice of the right soil tillage system for the crops in rotation help reduce energy consumption, thus maize: 97.3-97.9% at minimum tillage and 91.3% at no-tillage, soybean: 98.6-98.2% at minimum tillage and 92.8% at no-tillage, wheat: 97.4-98% at minimum tillage and 91.6% at no-tillage. Energy efficiency is in relation to reductions in energy savings, but also with efficiency and impact on the tillage system on the cultivated plant. For all crops in rotation, energy efficiency (energy produced from 1 MJ consumed) was the best in no-tillage and 10.44 MJ ha at maize, 6.49 MJ ha at soybean, 5.66 MJ ha at wheat. Energy-efficient 11 1 agricultural system: the energy consumed-energy produced-energy yield, necessarily have to be supplemented by soil energy efficiency, with the conservative effect of the agricultural system. Only then the agricultural system will be sustainable, durable in agronomic, economic and ecological terms. The implementation of minimum and no-tillage soil systems have increased the organic matter content from 2 to 7.6% and water stabile aggregate content from 5.6 to 9.6%, at 0-30 cm depth, as compared to the conventional system. While the soil fertility and the wet aggregate stability have initially been low, the effect of conservation practices on the soil characteristics led to a positive impact on the water permeability in the soil. Availability of soil moisture during the crop growth led to a better plant watering condition. Subsequent release of conserved soil water regulated proper plant water condition and soil structure.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Conservative tillage systems, specific to sustainable agriculture, require productivity at least equal to that of conventional technology, optimized energy efficiency and, at the same time, diminished environmental impact. An energy saving way is that of implementing optimal technology specific to each culture and pedoclimatic area. The minimum tillage and no-tillage systems represent alternatives to the conventional system of soil tillage, due to their conservation effects on soil features and to the assured productions, maize: 96-98.1% at minimum tillage and 99.8% at no-tillage, soybean: 102.9-111.9% at minimum tillage and 117.2% at no-tillage, wheat: 93.4-96.8% at minimum tillage and 106.9% at no-tillage, as compared to the conventional system. Correct choice of the right soil tillage system for the crops in rotation help reduce energy consumption, thus maize: 97.3-97.9% at minimum tillage and 91.3% at no-tillage, soybean: 98.6-98.2% at minimum tillage and 92.8% at no-tillage, wheat: 97.4-98% at minimum tillage and 91.6% at no-tillage. Energy efficiency is in relation to reductions in energy savings, but also with efficiency and impact on the tillage system on the cultivated plant. For all crops in rotation, energy efficiency (energy produced from 1 MJ consumed) was the best in no-tillage and 10.44 MJ ha at maize, 6.49 MJ ha at soybean, 5.66 MJ ha at wheat. Energy-efficient 11 1 agricultural system: the energy consumed-energy produced-energy yield, necessarily have to be supplemented by soil energy efficiency, with the conservative effect of the agricultural system. Only then the agricultural system will be sustainable, durable in agronomic, economic and ecological terms. The implementation of minimum and no-tillage soil systems have increased the organic matter content from 2 to 7.6% and water stabile aggregate content from 5.6 to 9.6%, at 0-30 cm depth, as compared to the conventional system. While the soil fertility and the wet aggregate stability have initially been low, the effect of conservation practices on the soil characteristics led to a positive impact on the water permeability in the soil. Availability of soil moisture during the crop growth led to a better plant watering condition. Subsequent release of conserved soil water regulated proper plant water condition and soil structure.

Key concepts: Tillage, Minimum tillage, Strip-till, Agronomy, Mulch-till, Conventional tillage, Environmental science, Mathematics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Energy Efficiency of Conservative Tillage Systems in the Hilly Areas of Romania — Research Paper | ScholarLens