2012Unpublished venueRequires access

MYTHS AND FACTS ABOUT ASPARTAME AND SUCRALOSE : A CRITICAL REVIEW

Maganti Brahmini, Tanikonda Keerthi

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Earlier, a clinical research gave a clean chit to the artificial sweeteners, dismissing allegations that these sweeteners ind uce certain ailments. Aspartame has been found to be safe for human consumption by more than ninety countries worldwide, with FDA officials describing aspartame as “one of the most thoroughly tested and studied food additives the agency have ever approved” and its safety as “clearcut”. Th e dangers of aspartame are now wide ly known, but the risks of using sucralose are not documented - until now. When deciding between sucralose and aspartame, it is important to remember that studies conclude that both are safe when consumed with in reasonable limits.However, some consumer s rep orted symptoms which were believed to be associated with these sweeteners. When FDA probed in to the matter, it came with the conclusion that there is no enough medical evidence that suggests a link between these sweeteners and alleged illnesses. Thus, it can be deduced that artificial sweeteners can

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Earlier, a clinical research gave a clean chit to the artificial sweeteners, dismissing allegations that these sweeteners ind uce certain ailments. Aspartame has been found to be safe for human consumption by more than ninety countries worldwide, with FDA officials describing aspartame as “one of the most thoroughly tested and studied food additives the agency have ever approved” and its safety as “clearcut”. Th e dangers of aspartame are now wide ly known, but the risks of using sucralose are not documented - until now. When deciding between sucralose and aspartame, it is important to remember that studies conclude that both are safe when consumed with in reasonable limits.However, some consumer s rep orted symptoms which were believed to be associated with these sweeteners. When FDA probed in to the matter, it came with the conclusion that there is no enough medical evidence that suggests a link between these sweeteners and alleged illnesses. Thus, it can be deduced that artificial sweeteners can

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Earlier, a clinical research gave a clean chit to the artificial sweeteners, dismissing allegations that these sweeteners ind uce certain ailments. Aspartame has been found to be safe for human consumption by more than ninety countries worldwide, with FDA officials describing aspartame as “one of the most thoroughly tested and studied food additives the agency have ever approved” and its safety as “clearcut”. Th e dangers of aspartame are now wide ly known, but the risks of using sucralose are not documented - until now. When deciding between sucralose and aspartame, it is important to remember that studies conclude that both are safe when consumed with in reasonable limits.However, some consumer s rep orted symptoms which were believed to be associated with these sweeteners. When FDA probed in to the matter, it came with the conclusion that there is no enough medical evidence that suggests a link between these sweeteners and alleged illnesses. Thus, it can be deduced that artificial sweeteners can

Key concepts: Aspartame, Sucralose, Artificial Sweetener, Agency (philosophy), Medicine, Food science, Chemistry, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
MYTHS AND FACTS ABOUT ASPARTAME AND SUCRALOSE : A CRITICAL REVIEW — Research Paper | ScholarLens