2015International Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck SurgeryOpen access

Otoacoustic emissions in detection of pre-clinical noise induced cochlear damage in military personnel

Abhijeet Bhatia

Open full text 4 citations

Abstract

Background: Objective of current study to analyse the utility of TEOAEs and DPOAEs to detect cochlear damage due to chronic exposure to firearm noise in Indian military personnel at a preclinical stage. Military personnel are exposed to firearm noise and need to be assessed for cochlear damage periodically. Methods: This cross sectional study was conducted from May 2004 to Apr 2005. Indian army soldiers and general civilian population were included in the study. The TEOAE and DPOAE parameters of two control groups (civilians, no noise exposure, no HL: control group 1; soldiers, noise exposed, hearing loss: Control group 2) were compared with the study group (soldiers, noise exposure, no hearing loss: Study group). Results: TEOAE amplitudes of the study group varied significantly from those of both the control groups at almost all frequencies. Overall amplitude too followed a similar trend. However, although the DPOAE amplitude of the study group was less than that of control group 1, the difference was not significant. The DPOAE amplitude of study group varied significantly from control group 2. Conclusions: TEOAEs proved to be useful to distinguish between green ears and ears chronically exposed to impulse noise with and without hearing loss. But DPOAEs proved to be useful in distinguishing only between normal hearing from hearing loss ears.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: Objective of current study to analyse the utility of TEOAEs and DPOAEs to detect cochlear damage due to chronic exposure to firearm noise in Indian military personnel at a preclinical stage. Military personnel are exposed to firearm noise and need to be assessed for cochlear damage periodically. Methods: This cross sectional study was conducted from May 2004 to Apr 2005. Indian army soldiers and general civilian population were included in the study. The TEOAE and DPOAE parameters of two control groups (civilians, no noise exposure, no HL: control group 1; soldiers, noise exposed, hearing loss: Control group 2) were compared with the study group (soldiers, noise exposure, no hearing loss: Study group). Results: TEOAE amplitudes of the study group varied significantly from those of both the control groups at almost all frequencies. Overall amplitude too followed a similar trend. However, although the DPOAE amplitude of the study group was less than that of control group 1, the difference was not significant. The DPOAE amplitude of study group varied significantly from control group 2. Conclusions: TEOAEs proved to be useful to distinguish between green ears and ears chronically exposed to impulse noise with and without hearing loss. But DPOAEs proved to be useful in distinguishing only between normal hearing from hearing loss ears.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: Objective of current study to analyse the utility of TEOAEs and DPOAEs to detect cochlear damage due to chronic exposure to firearm noise in Indian military personnel at a preclinical stage. Military personnel are exposed to firearm noise and need to be assessed for cochlear damage periodically. Methods: This cross sectional study was conducted from May 2004 to Apr 2005. Indian army soldiers and general civilian population were included in the study. The TEOAE and DPOAE parameters of two control groups (civilians, no noise exposure, no HL: control group 1; soldiers, noise exposed, hearing loss: Control group 2) were compared with the study group (soldiers, noise exposure, no hearing loss: Study group). Results: TEOAE amplitudes of the study group varied significantly from those of both the control groups at almost all frequencies. Overall amplitude too followed a similar trend. However, although the DPOAE amplitude of the study group was less than that of control group 1, the difference was not significant. The DPOAE amplitude of study group varied significantly from control group 2. Conclusions: TEOAEs proved to be useful to distinguish between green ears and ears chronically exposed to impulse noise with and without hearing loss. But DPOAEs proved to be useful in distinguishing only between normal hearing from hearing loss ears.

Key concepts: Medicine, Audiology, Noise (video), Population, Noise-induced hearing loss, Hearing loss, Noise exposure, Environmental health

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Otoacoustic emissions in detection of pre-clinical noise induced cochlear damage in military personnel — Research Paper | ScholarLens