2012•Unpublished venueRequires access

Indoor residual spraying for prevention of malaria

Whether Irs

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) are the two primary vector control interventions for malaria prevention. Use of LLINs in malaria endemic sub-Saharan Africa has, with support from the Global Fund and other international agencies, become much more common in the past decade. LLINs are deemed a simpler intervention to implement than IRS, whereas IRS has the potential to reduce transmission more rapidly, if campaigns are implemented rigorously and with high levels of household coverage. IRS has some advantages over LLINs for outbreak control but is usually perceived as a time-limited intervention and its application is diffi cult to continue indefi nitely because of high cost implicated. Nevertheless, in 2010 alone, the President’s Malaria Initiative attempted to protect more than 27 million residents of 15 African countries, including Benin, by means of IRS with DDT or pyrethroid insecticides. 1

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) are the two primary vector control interventions for malaria prevention. Use of LLINs in malaria endemic sub-Saharan Africa has, with support from the Global Fund and other international agencies, become much more common in the past decade. LLINs are deemed a simpler intervention to implement than IRS, whereas IRS has the potential to reduce transmission more rapidly, if campaigns are implemented rigorously and with high levels of household coverage. IRS has some advantages over LLINs for outbreak control but is usually perceived as a time-limited intervention and its application is diffi cult to continue indefi nitely because of high cost implicated. Nevertheless, in 2010 alone, the President’s Malaria Initiative attempted to protect more than 27 million residents of 15 African countries, including Benin, by means of IRS with DDT or pyrethroid insecticides. 1

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) are the two primary vector control interventions for malaria prevention. Use of LLINs in malaria endemic sub-Saharan Africa has, with support from the Global Fund and other international agencies, become much more common in the past decade. LLINs are deemed a simpler intervention to implement than IRS, whereas IRS has the potential to reduce transmission more rapidly, if campaigns are implemented rigorously and with high levels of household coverage. IRS has some advantages over LLINs for outbreak control but is usually perceived as a time-limited intervention and its application is diffi cult to continue indefi nitely because of high cost implicated. Nevertheless, in 2010 alone, the President’s Malaria Initiative attempted to protect more than 27 million residents of 15 African countries, including Benin, by means of IRS with DDT or pyrethroid insecticides. 1

Key concepts: Indoor residual spraying, Malaria, Environmental health, Psychological intervention, Intervention (counseling), Mosquito control, Medicine, Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Indoor residual spraying for prevention of malaria — Research Paper | ScholarLens