2017Unpublished venueRequires access

The Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation

K. G. Renard, J. M. Laflen, G. R. Foster, D. K. McCool

Open publisher page 1,137 citations

Abstract

The Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE), has been the workhorse of erosion prediction and conservation planning technology in the U. S. and even worldwide. In 1985, at a meeting of U. S. Department of Agriculture and other erosion researchers, it was decided that the USLE should be revised to incorporate additional research and technology developed after the 1978 USLE handbook. The R-factor represents the input that drives the sheet and rill erosion processes. The K-factor is a measure of the inherent erodibility of a given soil under the standard condition of the unit USLE plot maintained in continuous fallow. More questions and concerns are expressed over the L-factor than any of the other USLE factors. The C-factor is perhaps the most important USLE/ Revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE) factor because it represents conditions that can most easily be managed to reduce erosion. RUSLE P-factors are treated as the product of subfactors computed based on practices applied to the landscape.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE), has been the workhorse of erosion prediction and conservation planning technology in the U. S. and even worldwide. In 1985, at a meeting of U. S. Department of Agriculture and other erosion researchers, it was decided that the USLE should be revised to incorporate additional research and technology developed after the 1978 USLE handbook. The R-factor represents the input that drives the sheet and rill erosion processes. The K-factor is a measure of the inherent erodibility of a given soil under the standard condition of the unit USLE plot maintained in continuous fallow. More questions and concerns are expressed over the L-factor than any of the other USLE factors. The C-factor is perhaps the most important USLE/ Revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE) factor because it represents conditions that can most easily be managed to reduce erosion. RUSLE P-factors are treated as the product of subfactors computed based on practices applied to the landscape.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1137 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE), has been the workhorse of erosion prediction and conservation planning technology in the U. S. and even worldwide. In 1985, at a meeting of U. S. Department of Agriculture and other erosion researchers, it was decided that the USLE should be revised to incorporate additional research and technology developed after the 1978 USLE handbook. The R-factor represents the input that drives the sheet and rill erosion processes. The K-factor is a measure of the inherent erodibility of a given soil under the standard condition of the unit USLE plot maintained in continuous fallow. More questions and concerns are expressed over the L-factor than any of the other USLE factors. The C-factor is perhaps the most important USLE/ Revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE) factor because it represents conditions that can most easily be managed to reduce erosion. RUSLE P-factors are treated as the product of subfactors computed based on practices applied to the landscape.

Key concepts: Universal Soil Loss Equation, Soil loss, Environmental science, Mathematics, Psychology, Geology, Geomorphology, Erosion

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation — Research Paper | ScholarLens