2008Unpublished venueRequires access

COMPARISON OF DIRECT, MIXED MODEL, AND BAYESIAN METROPOLITAN STATISTICAL AREA ESTIMATES FOR THE INSURANCE COMPONENT OF THE MEDICAL EXPENDITURE PANEL SURVEY (MEPS)

Robert M. Baskin, John Sommers

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey is a family of sample surveys. The Insurance Component of MEPS provides national and state level estimates of insurance offered and provided by employers in the U.S. In recent years the demand for reliable data at the state level and below, regarding healthcare insurance has greatly increased. Previous research has been conducted to produce direct design-based estimates using the MEPS Insurance Component design structure. However, the number of Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) for which direct estimates can be produced with acceptable reliability is limited. In this paper, we evaluate mixed models and Bayesian models, incorporating a time covariate, to produce MSA level estimates for smaller MSAs in ten states. We examine estimates of MSE and RSE of two types of estimates based on direct and indirect estimation techniques.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey is a family of sample surveys. The Insurance Component of MEPS provides national and state level estimates of insurance offered and provided by employers in the U.S. In recent years the demand for reliable data at the state level and below, regarding healthcare insurance has greatly increased. Previous research has been conducted to produce direct design-based estimates using the MEPS Insurance Component design structure. However, the number of Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) for which direct estimates can be produced with acceptable reliability is limited. In this paper, we evaluate mixed models and Bayesian models, incorporating a time covariate, to produce MSA level estimates for smaller MSAs in ten states. We examine estimates of MSE and RSE of two types of estimates based on direct and indirect estimation techniques.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey is a family of sample surveys. The Insurance Component of MEPS provides national and state level estimates of insurance offered and provided by employers in the U.S. In recent years the demand for reliable data at the state level and below, regarding healthcare insurance has greatly increased. Previous research has been conducted to produce direct design-based estimates using the MEPS Insurance Component design structure. However, the number of Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) for which direct estimates can be produced with acceptable reliability is limited. In this paper, we evaluate mixed models and Bayesian models, incorporating a time covariate, to produce MSA level estimates for smaller MSAs in ten states. We examine estimates of MSE and RSE of two types of estimates based on direct and indirect estimation techniques.

Key concepts: Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, Metropolitan area, Econometrics, Covariate, Component (thermodynamics), Estimation, Small area estimation, Bayesian probability

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
COMPARISON OF DIRECT, MIXED MODEL, AND BAYESIAN METROPOLITAN STATISTICAL AREA ESTIMATES FOR THE INSURANCE COMPONENT OF THE MEDICAL EXPENDITURE PANEL SURVEY (MEPS) — Research Paper | ScholarLens