2015Unpublished venueRequires access

An overview of psd: Adaptive sine multitaper power spectral density estimation in R

Andrew J. Barbour, Robert L. Parker

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This vignette provides an overview of some features included in the package psd, designed to compute estimates of power spectral density (PSD) for a univariate series in a sophisticated manner, with very little tuning effort. The sine multitapers are used, and the number of tapers varies with spectral shape, according to the optimal value proposed by Riedel and Sidorenko (1995). The adaptive procedure itera-tively refines the optimal number of tapers at each frequency based on the spectrum from the previous iteration. Assuming the adaptive procedure converges, this produces power spectra with significantly lower spectral variance relative to results from less-sophisticated estimators. Sine tapers exhibit excellent leakage suppression characteristics, so bias effects are also reduced. Resolution and uncertainty vary with the number of tapers, which means we do not need to resort to either (1) windowing methods, which in-herently degrade resolution at low-frequency (e.g. Welch’s method); or (2) smoothing kernels, which can badly distort important features without careful tuning (e.g. the Daniell kernel in stats::spectrum). In this regards psd is best suited for data having large dynamic range and some mix of narrow and wide-band structure, features typically found in geophysical datasets.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This vignette provides an overview of some features included in the package psd, designed to compute estimates of power spectral density (PSD) for a univariate series in a sophisticated manner, with very little tuning effort. The sine multitapers are used, and the number of tapers varies with spectral shape, according to the optimal value proposed by Riedel and Sidorenko (1995). The adaptive procedure itera-tively refines the optimal number of tapers at each frequency based on the spectrum from the previous iteration. Assuming the adaptive procedure converges, this produces power spectra with significantly lower spectral variance relative to results from less-sophisticated estimators. Sine tapers exhibit excellent leakage suppression characteristics, so bias effects are also reduced. Resolution and uncertainty vary with the number of tapers, which means we do not need to resort to either (1) windowing methods, which in-herently degrade resolution at low-frequency (e.g. Welch’s method); or (2) smoothing kernels, which can badly distort important features without careful tuning (e.g. the Daniell kernel in stats::spectrum). In this regards psd is best suited for data having large dynamic range and some mix of narrow and wide-band structure, features typically found in geophysical datasets.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This vignette provides an overview of some features included in the package psd, designed to compute estimates of power spectral density (PSD) for a univariate series in a sophisticated manner, with very little tuning effort. The sine multitapers are used, and the number of tapers varies with spectral shape, according to the optimal value proposed by Riedel and Sidorenko (1995). The adaptive procedure itera-tively refines the optimal number of tapers at each frequency based on the spectrum from the previous iteration. Assuming the adaptive procedure converges, this produces power spectra with significantly lower spectral variance relative to results from less-sophisticated estimators. Sine tapers exhibit excellent leakage suppression characteristics, so bias effects are also reduced. Resolution and uncertainty vary with the number of tapers, which means we do not need to resort to either (1) windowing methods, which in-herently degrade resolution at low-frequency (e.g. Welch’s method); or (2) smoothing kernels, which can badly distort important features without careful tuning (e.g. the Daniell kernel in stats::spectrum). In this regards psd is best suited for data having large dynamic range and some mix of narrow and wide-band structure, features typically found in geophysical datasets.

Key concepts: Multitaper, Spectral density, Estimator, Spectral leakage, Sine, Smoothing, Mathematics, Algorithm

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
An overview of psd: Adaptive sine multitaper power spectral density estimation in R — Research Paper | ScholarLens