2015•Unpublished venueRequires access

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT TILLAGE METHODS ON SOIL PHYSICAL PROPERTIES AND CROP YIELD OF MELON (Cucumis melo)

Majid Rashidi, Fereydoun Keshavarzpour

Open publisher page 32 citations

Abstract

A two year field experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of different tillage methods on soil physical properties and crop yield of melon. Tillage treatments in the study were moldboard plow + two passes of disk harrow as conventional tillage (CT), two passes of disk harrow as reduced tillage (RT), one pass of disk harrow as minimum tillage (MT) and no-tillage (NT) as direct drilling method. The statistical results of the study indicated that tillage method significantly (P ≤ 0.05) affected crop yield, fruit weight, fruit length, fruit diameter, total soluble solids and root dry matter, but there was no significant differences in other components such as number of plants per hectare, number of fruits per plant and root length. The maximum value of crop yield (27.2 t ha-1), number of plants per hectare (6360) and number of fruits per plant (1.9) was obtained in case of CT treatment, while maximum value of fruit weight (3.6kg), total soluble solids (10.25%), root length (42.3cm) and root dry matter (72.5%) was observed in case of RT treatment. Also, maximum value of fruit length (29.0cm) and fruit diameter (17.2cm) was noted in case of MT treatment. Conversely, the minimum value of crop yield (20.6 t ha-1), number of plants per hectare (5910), fruit weight (1.9kg), fruit length (26.4cm), fruit diameter (14.1cm), root length (36.6cm) and root dry matter (54.1%) was obtained in case of NT treatment, while minimum value of number of fruits per plant (1.2) was observed in case of RT treatment. Moreover, minimum value of total soluble solids (9.75%) was noted in case of MT treatment. The statistical results of the study also indicated that tillage

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A two year field experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of different tillage methods on soil physical properties and crop yield of melon. Tillage treatments in the study were moldboard plow + two passes of disk harrow as conventional tillage (CT), two passes of disk harrow as reduced tillage (RT), one pass of disk harrow as minimum tillage (MT) and no-tillage (NT) as direct drilling method. The statistical results of the study indicated that tillage method significantly (P ≤ 0.05) affected crop yield, fruit weight, fruit length, fruit diameter, total soluble solids and root dry matter, but there was no significant differences in other components such as number of plants per hectare, number of fruits per plant and root length. The maximum value of crop yield (27.2 t ha-1), number of plants per hectare (6360) and number of fruits per plant (1.9) was obtained in case of CT treatment, while maximum value of fruit weight (3.6kg), total soluble solids (10.25%), root length (42.3cm) and root dry matter (72.5%) was observed in case of RT treatment. Also, maximum value of fruit length (29.0cm) and fruit diameter (17.2cm) was noted in case of MT treatment. Conversely, the minimum value of crop yield (20.6 t ha-1), number of plants per hectare (5910), fruit weight (1.9kg), fruit length (26.4cm), fruit diameter (14.1cm), root length (36.6cm) and root dry matter (54.1%) was obtained in case of NT treatment, while minimum value of number of fruits per plant (1.2) was observed in case of RT treatment. Moreover, minimum value of total soluble solids (9.75%) was noted in case of MT treatment. The statistical results of the study also indicated that tillage

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 32 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A two year field experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of different tillage methods on soil physical properties and crop yield of melon. Tillage treatments in the study were moldboard plow + two passes of disk harrow as conventional tillage (CT), two passes of disk harrow as reduced tillage (RT), one pass of disk harrow as minimum tillage (MT) and no-tillage (NT) as direct drilling method. The statistical results of the study indicated that tillage method significantly (P ≤ 0.05) affected crop yield, fruit weight, fruit length, fruit diameter, total soluble solids and root dry matter, but there was no significant differences in other components such as number of plants per hectare, number of fruits per plant and root length. The maximum value of crop yield (27.2 t ha-1), number of plants per hectare (6360) and number of fruits per plant (1.9) was obtained in case of CT treatment, while maximum value of fruit weight (3.6kg), total soluble solids (10.25%), root length (42.3cm) and root dry matter (72.5%) was observed in case of RT treatment. Also, maximum value of fruit length (29.0cm) and fruit diameter (17.2cm) was noted in case of MT treatment. Conversely, the minimum value of crop yield (20.6 t ha-1), number of plants per hectare (5910), fruit weight (1.9kg), fruit length (26.4cm), fruit diameter (14.1cm), root length (36.6cm) and root dry matter (54.1%) was obtained in case of NT treatment, while minimum value of number of fruits per plant (1.2) was observed in case of RT treatment. Moreover, minimum value of total soluble solids (9.75%) was noted in case of MT treatment. The statistical results of the study also indicated that tillage

Key concepts: Harrow, Hectare, Tillage, Mathematics, Melon, Agronomy, Crop, Plough

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
EFFECT OF DIFFERENT TILLAGE METHODS ON SOIL PHYSICAL PROPERTIES AND CROP YIELD OF MELON (Cucumis melo) — Research Paper | ScholarLens