2012Unpublished venueRequires access

EFFICACY OF THE GEOGRAPHICALLY WEIGHTED MODEL ON THE MASS APPRAISAL PROCESS

Tony Lockwood, Peter Rossini

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Single transparent models are increasingly being sought to account for site and capital value as well as location in the geographically smaller outer metropolitan urban suburbs in which there was often assumed little or no spatial variation. This paper compares the use of a Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) hedonic model with the more traditional hedonic models where there is market evidence of both vacant land and improved residential values. This study found that where there is evidence of spatial variation and a presence of both improved and at least some vacant land sales the GWR model exhibited specification limitations that the more traditional models such as hybrid models did not and that the latter were able to more accurately predict vacant land prices while also accounting for location.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Single transparent models are increasingly being sought to account for site and capital value as well as location in the geographically smaller outer metropolitan urban suburbs in which there was often assumed little or no spatial variation. This paper compares the use of a Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) hedonic model with the more traditional hedonic models where there is market evidence of both vacant land and improved residential values. This study found that where there is evidence of spatial variation and a presence of both improved and at least some vacant land sales the GWR model exhibited specification limitations that the more traditional models such as hybrid models did not and that the latter were able to more accurately predict vacant land prices while also accounting for location.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Single transparent models are increasingly being sought to account for site and capital value as well as location in the geographically smaller outer metropolitan urban suburbs in which there was often assumed little or no spatial variation. This paper compares the use of a Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) hedonic model with the more traditional hedonic models where there is market evidence of both vacant land and improved residential values. This study found that where there is evidence of spatial variation and a presence of both improved and at least some vacant land sales the GWR model exhibited specification limitations that the more traditional models such as hybrid models did not and that the latter were able to more accurately predict vacant land prices while also accounting for location.

Key concepts: Geographically Weighted Regression, Econometrics, Hedonic regression, Metropolitan area, Land value, Hedonic pricing, Land Values, Geography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
EFFICACY OF THE GEOGRAPHICALLY WEIGHTED MODEL ON THE MASS APPRAISAL PROCESS — Research Paper | ScholarLens