International Law and the Torture Memos
Michael P. Scharf
Abstract
Open-access reader
Michael P. Scharf
Abstract
Open-access reader
This article explores the influence of international law in the evolution of the Bush Administration's policies toward detainees in the global war on terror.The detainee case study provides a modern lens for evaluating Jack Goldsmith and Eric Posner's hypothesis set forth in THE LIMITS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW that international law exerts no "compliance pull" on American policymakers in times of crisis.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This article explores the influence of international law in the evolution of the Bush Administration's policies toward detainees in the global war on terror.The detainee case study provides a modern lens for evaluating Jack Goldsmith and Eric Posner's hypothesis set forth in THE LIMITS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW that international law exerts no "compliance pull" on American policymakers in times of crisis.
Key concepts: Torture, International law, Political science, Law, War on terror, Compliance (psychology), Municipal law, Human rights