2009•Unpublished venueRequires access

Patrimonial Economic Voting: A Neglected Dimension

Richard Nadeau, Martial Foucault, Michael S. Lewis‐Beck

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

Economic voting studies have been dominated by the classic rewardpunishment paradigm, where voters vote for the incumbent under good economic performance, but against under bad. This paradigm works well when the economic issue is a valence issue, such as prosperity. However, it leaves out positional economic voting, where the voter’s place in the economic structure in‡uences policy preference and, thus, party preference. More precisely, we suggest that the better the economic location of voters in terms of wealth (or patrimony), high-risk wealth in particular, the more they will vote right, because the right promises a better return on their

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Economic voting studies have been dominated by the classic rewardpunishment paradigm, where voters vote for the incumbent under good economic performance, but against under bad. This paradigm works well when the economic issue is a valence issue, such as prosperity. However, it leaves out positional economic voting, where the voter’s place in the economic structure in‡uences policy preference and, thus, party preference. More precisely, we suggest that the better the economic location of voters in terms of wealth (or patrimony), high-risk wealth in particular, the more they will vote right, because the right promises a better return on their

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Economic voting studies have been dominated by the classic rewardpunishment paradigm, where voters vote for the incumbent under good economic performance, but against under bad. This paradigm works well when the economic issue is a valence issue, such as prosperity. However, it leaves out positional economic voting, where the voter’s place in the economic structure in‡uences policy preference and, thus, party preference. More precisely, we suggest that the better the economic location of voters in terms of wealth (or patrimony), high-risk wealth in particular, the more they will vote right, because the right promises a better return on their

Key concepts: Voting, Prosperity, Economics, Preference, Dimension (graph theory), Public economics, Political science, Economic system

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Patrimonial Economic Voting: A Neglected Dimension — Research Paper | ScholarLens