Increasing benefits to Australia from WTO agricultural trade liberalisation
Troy Podbury, Ivan Roberts, David Vanzetti, Brian S. Fisher
Abstract
Troy Podbury, Ivan Roberts, David Vanzetti, Brian S. Fisher
Abstract
Despite the failure to launch a new round of trade negotiations at Seattle, further negotiations on agriculture are scheduled as part of the in-built agenda of the World Trade Organisation (WTO). In this paper it is shown that global benefits from agricultural trade liberalisation are substantial. It is desirable that Australia continues to press for a more comprehensive round of negotiations, while continuing to negotiate on agriculture. This is because the likelihood of negotiating a successful outcome for agriculture is greater under more comprehensive negotiations.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Despite the failure to launch a new round of trade negotiations at Seattle, further negotiations on agriculture are scheduled as part of the in-built agenda of the World Trade Organisation (WTO). In this paper it is shown that global benefits from agricultural trade liberalisation are substantial. It is desirable that Australia continues to press for a more comprehensive round of negotiations, while continuing to negotiate on agriculture. This is because the likelihood of negotiating a successful outcome for agriculture is greater under more comprehensive negotiations.
Key concepts: Negotiation, Agriculture, Liberalization, International trade, World trade, Multilateral trade negotiations, Free trade, Business