2012Unpublished venueRequires access

A Comparative Analysis of Agricultural Performance between the Military and Civilian Regimes in Nigeria

Uyi Kizito

Open publisher page 10 citations

Abstract

The paper examines and compares the performance of the agricultural sector during the Military and the Civilian Regimes in Nigeria. It also compares the proportion of public expenditures on agriculture with the allocations to other sectors of the economy such as Education, Health and Transport. The paper adopts a descriptive approach and the findings show that there is a direct relationship between the proportion of public expenditure and agricultural performance and that public expenditure on the Agricultural Sector lags behind the expenditures on these other sectors. The paper also shows that the Agricultural Sector received more percentage of public expenditure during the Civilian regime but the contribution of agriculture to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) was higher during the Military than the Civilian regime. This shows that the performance of agriculture is not only a function of the proportion of public expenditure, but a combination of factors such as judicious use of the resources, the quality of agricultural policies/programmes embarked upon, among others. The paper therefore recommends increased budgetary allocation to the Agricultural Sector as well as its proper and judicious use to guarantee poverty reduction, sustainable livelihood and enhanced food security.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The paper examines and compares the performance of the agricultural sector during the Military and the Civilian Regimes in Nigeria. It also compares the proportion of public expenditures on agriculture with the allocations to other sectors of the economy such as Education, Health and Transport. The paper adopts a descriptive approach and the findings show that there is a direct relationship between the proportion of public expenditure and agricultural performance and that public expenditure on the Agricultural Sector lags behind the expenditures on these other sectors. The paper also shows that the Agricultural Sector received more percentage of public expenditure during the Civilian regime but the contribution of agriculture to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) was higher during the Military than the Civilian regime. This shows that the performance of agriculture is not only a function of the proportion of public expenditure, but a combination of factors such as judicious use of the resources, the quality of agricultural policies/programmes embarked upon, among others. The paper therefore recommends increased budgetary allocation to the Agricultural Sector as well as its proper and judicious use to guarantee poverty reduction, sustainable livelihood and enhanced food security.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The paper examines and compares the performance of the agricultural sector during the Military and the Civilian Regimes in Nigeria. It also compares the proportion of public expenditures on agriculture with the allocations to other sectors of the economy such as Education, Health and Transport. The paper adopts a descriptive approach and the findings show that there is a direct relationship between the proportion of public expenditure and agricultural performance and that public expenditure on the Agricultural Sector lags behind the expenditures on these other sectors. The paper also shows that the Agricultural Sector received more percentage of public expenditure during the Civilian regime but the contribution of agriculture to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) was higher during the Military than the Civilian regime. This shows that the performance of agriculture is not only a function of the proportion of public expenditure, but a combination of factors such as judicious use of the resources, the quality of agricultural policies/programmes embarked upon, among others. The paper therefore recommends increased budgetary allocation to the Agricultural Sector as well as its proper and judicious use to guarantee poverty reduction, sustainable livelihood and enhanced food security.

Key concepts: Agriculture, Livelihood, Public expenditure, Public sector, Gross domestic product, Food security, Business, Economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Comparative Analysis of Agricultural Performance between the Military and Civilian Regimes in Nigeria — Research Paper | ScholarLens