1999Peritoneal Dialysis InternationalRequires access

The Risk of Infection and Peritoneal Catheter Loss from Implant Procedure Exit-Site Trauma

John H. Crabtree, Arnold Fishman, Rukhsana A. Siddiqi, Linda L. Hadnott

Open publisher page 19 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of skin and subcutaneous tissue trauma at the time of catheter implant procedure as a determinant of catheter loss from infectious complications. DESIGN: Nonrandomized study with prospective collection of data. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients were divided into three groups based upon how the catheter was exited through the skin: group 1, procedure involved pulling tubing, with a permanently bonded catheter adapter, through the exit-site wound (n = 43); group 2, same as group 1 except exit wounds were closed around the catheter with a suture (n = 20); group 3, procedure involved pulling only tubing through the exit wound (n = 61). SETTING: Primary medical center for a health maintenance organization. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Log rank comparisons of Kaplan-Meier analyses of first occurrences of infectious events and overall catheter survival. RESULTS: The risk of first exit-site infection (p < 0.001), tunnel infection (p < 0.001), catheter infection-related peritonitis (p < 0.001), and catheter loss (p < 0.01) were greatest in group 1 with large exit wounds, and lowest in group 3 with small exit wounds. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates the importance of careful dissection and exit-site construction. The exit site should consist of the smallest hole possible that permits passage of only the tubing and leaves the skin snug around the catheter. The present report incriminates catheter designs employing permanently bonded adapters that result in large pericannular wounds that are prone to infection and catheter loss.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of skin and subcutaneous tissue trauma at the time of catheter implant procedure as a determinant of catheter loss from infectious complications. DESIGN: Nonrandomized study with prospective collection of data. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients were divided into three groups based upon how the catheter was exited through the skin: group 1, procedure involved pulling tubing, with a permanently bonded catheter adapter, through the exit-site wound (n = 43); group 2, same as group 1 except exit wounds were closed around the catheter with a suture (n = 20); group 3, procedure involved pulling only tubing through the exit wound (n = 61). SETTING: Primary medical center for a health maintenance organization. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Log rank comparisons of Kaplan-Meier analyses of first occurrences of infectious events and overall catheter survival. RESULTS: The risk of first exit-site infection (p < 0.001), tunnel infection (p < 0.001), catheter infection-related peritonitis (p < 0.001), and catheter loss (p < 0.01) were greatest in group 1 with large exit wounds, and lowest in group 3 with small exit wounds. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates the importance of careful dissection and exit-site construction. The exit site should consist of the smallest hole possible that permits passage of only the tubing and leaves the skin snug around the catheter. The present report incriminates catheter designs employing permanently bonded adapters that result in large pericannular wounds that are prone to infection and catheter loss.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of skin and subcutaneous tissue trauma at the time of catheter implant procedure as a determinant of catheter loss from infectious complications. DESIGN: Nonrandomized study with prospective collection of data. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients were divided into three groups based upon how the catheter was exited through the skin: group 1, procedure involved pulling tubing, with a permanently bonded catheter adapter, through the exit-site wound (n = 43); group 2, same as group 1 except exit wounds were closed around the catheter with a suture (n = 20); group 3, procedure involved pulling only tubing through the exit wound (n = 61). SETTING: Primary medical center for a health maintenance organization. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Log rank comparisons of Kaplan-Meier analyses of first occurrences of infectious events and overall catheter survival. RESULTS: The risk of first exit-site infection (p < 0.001), tunnel infection (p < 0.001), catheter infection-related peritonitis (p < 0.001), and catheter loss (p < 0.01) were greatest in group 1 with large exit wounds, and lowest in group 3 with small exit wounds. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates the importance of careful dissection and exit-site construction. The exit site should consist of the smallest hole possible that permits passage of only the tubing and leaves the skin snug around the catheter. The present report incriminates catheter designs employing permanently bonded adapters that result in large pericannular wounds that are prone to infection and catheter loss.

Key concepts: Peritoneal dialysis, Medicine, Implant, Catheter, Exit site, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Risk of Infection and Peritoneal Catheter Loss from Implant Procedure Exit-Site Trauma — Research Paper | ScholarLens