2010Unpublished venueRequires access

Laboratory Investigations of Reinforced Sub Grade Soils

P. P. Sawant

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Most of the flexible pavements in India need to be constructed over problematic and poor subgrade. Such subgrades have low California Bearing Ratio (CBR), which leads to more thickness of the pavement. Decrease in avability of suitable subbase and base materials for highway construction have leads to a search for economic method of converting locally available troublesome soil to suitable construction materials. The present research has been undertaken to to study the effect of geogrid reinforcement on Maximum dry Density (MDD), Optimum Moisture Content (OMC), California Bearing Ratio (CBR) and E- Value of subgrade soils. Two types of soils with varying properties and one types of geogrid were selected for this study. The soils were refered as Soil – A and Soil – B. from the study it is cleared that there is considerable improvement in CBR value of subgrade due to geogrid reinforcement and it is the function of types of soil and position of geogrid. In case of soil - A and soil – B the CBR value were 4.15 % and 1.1 % respectively. This value increased to 6.83 % and 2.52 % respectively due to geogrid places at 80% depth from top of the specimen.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Most of the flexible pavements in India need to be constructed over problematic and poor subgrade. Such subgrades have low California Bearing Ratio (CBR), which leads to more thickness of the pavement. Decrease in avability of suitable subbase and base materials for highway construction have leads to a search for economic method of converting locally available troublesome soil to suitable construction materials. The present research has been undertaken to to study the effect of geogrid reinforcement on Maximum dry Density (MDD), Optimum Moisture Content (OMC), California Bearing Ratio (CBR) and E- Value of subgrade soils. Two types of soils with varying properties and one types of geogrid were selected for this study. The soils were refered as Soil – A and Soil – B. from the study it is cleared that there is considerable improvement in CBR value of subgrade due to geogrid reinforcement and it is the function of types of soil and position of geogrid. In case of soil - A and soil – B the CBR value were 4.15 % and 1.1 % respectively. This value increased to 6.83 % and 2.52 % respectively due to geogrid places at 80% depth from top of the specimen.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Most of the flexible pavements in India need to be constructed over problematic and poor subgrade. Such subgrades have low California Bearing Ratio (CBR), which leads to more thickness of the pavement. Decrease in avability of suitable subbase and base materials for highway construction have leads to a search for economic method of converting locally available troublesome soil to suitable construction materials. The present research has been undertaken to to study the effect of geogrid reinforcement on Maximum dry Density (MDD), Optimum Moisture Content (OMC), California Bearing Ratio (CBR) and E- Value of subgrade soils. Two types of soils with varying properties and one types of geogrid were selected for this study. The soils were refered as Soil – A and Soil – B. from the study it is cleared that there is considerable improvement in CBR value of subgrade due to geogrid reinforcement and it is the function of types of soil and position of geogrid. In case of soil - A and soil – B the CBR value were 4.15 % and 1.1 % respectively. This value increased to 6.83 % and 2.52 % respectively due to geogrid places at 80% depth from top of the specimen.

Key concepts: Subgrade, Geogrid, California bearing ratio, Subbase, Geotechnical engineering, Soil water, Bearing capacity, Environmental science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Laboratory Investigations of Reinforced Sub Grade Soils — Research Paper | ScholarLens