Ambiguity Aversion: An Axiomatic Approach Using Second Order Probabilities
William S. Neilson
Abstract
William S. Neilson
Abstract
This paper presents an axiomatic characterization of preferences which allow ambiguity aversion. It is assumed that decision makers treat risky lotteries and ambiguous lotteries separately, with preferences governed by the von Neumann-Morgenstern axioms for risk and a variant of the Savage axioms for ambiguity. These axioms imply that the decision maker chooses among risks according to expected utility, forms subjective second order probabilities over possible risks, and chooses among ambiguous lotteries according to a modi…ed version of subjective expected utility. Furthermore, the decision maker has two utility functions, one governing attitudes toward risk and one governing attitudes toward ambiguity. Conditions governing ambiguity aversion, comparative ambiguity aversion, and decreasing ambiguity aversion are derived, and are similar to the familiar Arrow-Pratt characterizations for risk aversion.
OpenAlex reports 25 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This paper presents an axiomatic characterization of preferences which allow ambiguity aversion. It is assumed that decision makers treat risky lotteries and ambiguous lotteries separately, with preferences governed by the von Neumann-Morgenstern axioms for risk and a variant of the Savage axioms for ambiguity. These axioms imply that the decision maker chooses among risks according to expected utility, forms subjective second order probabilities over possible risks, and chooses among ambiguous lotteries according to a modi…ed version of subjective expected utility. Furthermore, the decision maker has two utility functions, one governing attitudes toward risk and one governing attitudes toward ambiguity. Conditions governing ambiguity aversion, comparative ambiguity aversion, and decreasing ambiguity aversion are derived, and are similar to the familiar Arrow-Pratt characterizations for risk aversion.
Key concepts: Ambiguity aversion, Axiom, Ambiguity, Subjective expected utility, Expected utility hypothesis, Mathematical economics, Risk aversion (psychology), Von Neumann–Morgenstern utility theorem