2010PubMedRequires access

The role of radiofrequency ablation as a first line therapy in the treatment of atrial flutter.

Radu Roşu, Lucian Mureşan, Marius Andronache, Dana Pop, Gheorghe Nicușor Pop, Maria Pușchiță, Adina Mălai, Gabriel Guşetu, Dumitru Zdrenghea

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Cavo-tricuspid isthmus radiofrequency (RF) ablation is an efficient option in the treatment of atrial flutter. In the case of a well-tolerated, first episode of atrial flutter, it has a class II indication, level of evidence B, the current first-line therapeutic option being electrical cardioversion, pharmacological cardioversion or atrial overdrive pacing followed by long-term antiarrhythmic therapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate, in a prospective manner, the recurrence rate of these two different therapeutic options after the treatment of a first episode of atrial flutter. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between January 2007 and May 2009, for 99 patients admitted to the hospital for a first episode of atrial flutter, cardioversion was attempted either by RF ablation (group 1-42 patients), or by electrical cardioversion, pharmacological cardioversion or atrial overdrive pacing followed by long-term Amiodarone therapy (group 21-57 patients). We compared the recurrence rate of atrial flutter in the 2 groups after a follow-up period of one year. RESULTS: In group 1, sinus rhythm was achieved in all patients, with bidirectional isthmic block being obtained for 37 patients (88.1%). In group 2, conversion to sinus rhythm was obtained in all cases. The recurrence rate was 6 times higher in group 2 vs group 1 (57.9% = 33 patients vs 9.5% = 4 patients) (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: RF ablation should be considered as a therapeutic option in the treatment of the first episode of atrial flutter, due to its significant efficiency in maintaining sinus rhythm and to its low recurrence rate.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

UNLABELLED: Cavo-tricuspid isthmus radiofrequency (RF) ablation is an efficient option in the treatment of atrial flutter. In the case of a well-tolerated, first episode of atrial flutter, it has a class II indication, level of evidence B, the current first-line therapeutic option being electrical cardioversion, pharmacological cardioversion or atrial overdrive pacing followed by long-term antiarrhythmic therapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate, in a prospective manner, the recurrence rate of these two different therapeutic options after the treatment of a first episode of atrial flutter. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between January 2007 and May 2009, for 99 patients admitted to the hospital for a first episode of atrial flutter, cardioversion was attempted either by RF ablation (group 1-42 patients), or by electrical cardioversion, pharmacological cardioversion or atrial overdrive pacing followed by long-term Amiodarone therapy (group 21-57 patients). We compared the recurrence rate of atrial flutter in the 2 groups after a follow-up period of one year. RESULTS: In group 1, sinus rhythm was achieved in all patients, with bidirectional isthmic block being obtained for 37 patients (88.1%). In group 2, conversion to sinus rhythm was obtained in all cases. The recurrence rate was 6 times higher in group 2 vs group 1 (57.9% = 33 patients vs 9.5% = 4 patients) (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: RF ablation should be considered as a therapeutic option in the treatment of the first episode of atrial flutter, due to its significant efficiency in maintaining sinus rhythm and to its low recurrence rate.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

UNLABELLED: Cavo-tricuspid isthmus radiofrequency (RF) ablation is an efficient option in the treatment of atrial flutter. In the case of a well-tolerated, first episode of atrial flutter, it has a class II indication, level of evidence B, the current first-line therapeutic option being electrical cardioversion, pharmacological cardioversion or atrial overdrive pacing followed by long-term antiarrhythmic therapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate, in a prospective manner, the recurrence rate of these two different therapeutic options after the treatment of a first episode of atrial flutter. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between January 2007 and May 2009, for 99 patients admitted to the hospital for a first episode of atrial flutter, cardioversion was attempted either by RF ablation (group 1-42 patients), or by electrical cardioversion, pharmacological cardioversion or atrial overdrive pacing followed by long-term Amiodarone therapy (group 21-57 patients). We compared the recurrence rate of atrial flutter in the 2 groups after a follow-up period of one year. RESULTS: In group 1, sinus rhythm was achieved in all patients, with bidirectional isthmic block being obtained for 37 patients (88.1%). In group 2, conversion to sinus rhythm was obtained in all cases. The recurrence rate was 6 times higher in group 2 vs group 1 (57.9% = 33 patients vs 9.5% = 4 patients) (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: RF ablation should be considered as a therapeutic option in the treatment of the first episode of atrial flutter, due to its significant efficiency in maintaining sinus rhythm and to its low recurrence rate.

Key concepts: Atrial flutter, Medicine, Sinus rhythm, Cardiology, Atrial fibrillation, Internal medicine, Cardioversion, Ablation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The role of radiofrequency ablation as a first line therapy in the treatment of atrial flutter. — Research Paper | ScholarLens