2002Unpublished venueRequires access

Dimensions and Consequences of Wage Rigidities in Germany

Ernst Fehr, Lorenz Götte, Friedhelm Pfeiffer

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Evidence for nominal wage rigidities have been found in a number of recent studies for countries with decentralised wage determination. In this paper we examine wage rigidities in West Germany, where wages are determined in a mixed system of central wage bargaining between unions and employer associations or unions and firms and individual wage bargaining. Our estimates based on individual data from 1975 to 1995 confirm that the rigidity of nominal wages is a robust phenomenon also in Germany. Rigidities from central wage agreements, however, dominate. According to our estimates roughly 45 percent of employees who stay in the same plant for two consecutive years are protected against wage reductions below central wage agreements. Wage rigidities are more distinct for employees with more stable employment histories, longer tenure and for employees in larger firms. The strength of wage rigidities is measured with the amount of prohibited wage decreases in the absence of a wage rigidity, the wage sweep-up. The wage sweep-up varied between 4 and 8 percent. Without central wage bargaining and nominal wage rigidities wages the distribution of wage changes would have been less compressed. Wage rigidities have real consequences and the findings confirm the existence of bargaining power of employees in wage determination in Germany. On the individual level higher wage rigidities do not imply higher unemployment or future wage risks. On the aggregate level higher wage sweeps-ups are associated with lower sector employment growth rates. JEL-Classification: J30, J41, J51

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Evidence for nominal wage rigidities have been found in a number of recent studies for countries with decentralised wage determination. In this paper we examine wage rigidities in West Germany, where wages are determined in a mixed system of central wage bargaining between unions and employer associations or unions and firms and individual wage bargaining. Our estimates based on individual data from 1975 to 1995 confirm that the rigidity of nominal wages is a robust phenomenon also in Germany. Rigidities from central wage agreements, however, dominate. According to our estimates roughly 45 percent of employees who stay in the same plant for two consecutive years are protected against wage reductions below central wage agreements. Wage rigidities are more distinct for employees with more stable employment histories, longer tenure and for employees in larger firms. The strength of wage rigidities is measured with the amount of prohibited wage decreases in the absence of a wage rigidity, the wage sweep-up. The wage sweep-up varied between 4 and 8 percent. Without central wage bargaining and nominal wage rigidities wages the distribution of wage changes would have been less compressed. Wage rigidities have real consequences and the findings confirm the existence of bargaining power of employees in wage determination in Germany. On the individual level higher wage rigidities do not imply higher unemployment or future wage risks. On the aggregate level higher wage sweeps-ups are associated with lower sector employment growth rates. JEL-Classification: J30, J41, J51

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Evidence for nominal wage rigidities have been found in a number of recent studies for countries with decentralised wage determination. In this paper we examine wage rigidities in West Germany, where wages are determined in a mixed system of central wage bargaining between unions and employer associations or unions and firms and individual wage bargaining. Our estimates based on individual data from 1975 to 1995 confirm that the rigidity of nominal wages is a robust phenomenon also in Germany. Rigidities from central wage agreements, however, dominate. According to our estimates roughly 45 percent of employees who stay in the same plant for two consecutive years are protected against wage reductions below central wage agreements. Wage rigidities are more distinct for employees with more stable employment histories, longer tenure and for employees in larger firms. The strength of wage rigidities is measured with the amount of prohibited wage decreases in the absence of a wage rigidity, the wage sweep-up. The wage sweep-up varied between 4 and 8 percent. Without central wage bargaining and nominal wage rigidities wages the distribution of wage changes would have been less compressed. Wage rigidities have real consequences and the findings confirm the existence of bargaining power of employees in wage determination in Germany. On the individual level higher wage rigidities do not imply higher unemployment or future wage risks. On the aggregate level higher wage sweeps-ups are associated with lower sector employment growth rates. JEL-Classification: J30, J41, J51

Key concepts: Wage, Economics, Efficiency wage, Labour economics, Unemployment, Bargaining power, Wage bargaining, Wage share

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Dimensions and Consequences of Wage Rigidities in Germany — Research Paper | ScholarLens