2010UND Scholarly Commons (University of North Dakota)Requires access

WORD ORDER TYPOLOGY IN MODERN SOUTH ARABIAN LANGUAGES: A STUDY BASED ON A CORPUS OF ANALYZED TEXTS

David A. Cross

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

In this thesis I present a typological analysis of the Modern South Arabian Languages. Typological research is often based on a six-way typology of dominant word order based on clauses containing nominal subjects, objects and verbs. However, this clause type is extremely rare in this language group, making typological analysis based on a six-way typology problematic. Dryer's Four-way typology of dominant word order is applied to the Modern South Arabian Languages and they are shown to be VS&VO. Greenberg's universals which refer to dominant word order are then reformulated in terms of the Four-way typology. These reformulated universals are shown to make correct predictions in most cases for the Modern South Arabian Languages. This analysis shows that using Dryer's Four-way typology of dominant word order makes it possible to readily apply the implicational universals to languages in which three-element clauses are extremely rare. In sum, this approach harnesses the implicational universals often used with the six-way typology to Dryer's Four-way typology to allow us to analyze languages with relatively few clauses with nominal subjects and objects.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this thesis I present a typological analysis of the Modern South Arabian Languages. Typological research is often based on a six-way typology of dominant word order based on clauses containing nominal subjects, objects and verbs. However, this clause type is extremely rare in this language group, making typological analysis based on a six-way typology problematic. Dryer's Four-way typology of dominant word order is applied to the Modern South Arabian Languages and they are shown to be VS&VO. Greenberg's universals which refer to dominant word order are then reformulated in terms of the Four-way typology. These reformulated universals are shown to make correct predictions in most cases for the Modern South Arabian Languages. This analysis shows that using Dryer's Four-way typology of dominant word order makes it possible to readily apply the implicational universals to languages in which three-element clauses are extremely rare. In sum, this approach harnesses the implicational universals often used with the six-way typology to Dryer's Four-way typology to allow us to analyze languages with relatively few clauses with nominal subjects and objects.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this thesis I present a typological analysis of the Modern South Arabian Languages. Typological research is often based on a six-way typology of dominant word order based on clauses containing nominal subjects, objects and verbs. However, this clause type is extremely rare in this language group, making typological analysis based on a six-way typology problematic. Dryer's Four-way typology of dominant word order is applied to the Modern South Arabian Languages and they are shown to be VS&VO. Greenberg's universals which refer to dominant word order are then reformulated in terms of the Four-way typology. These reformulated universals are shown to make correct predictions in most cases for the Modern South Arabian Languages. This analysis shows that using Dryer's Four-way typology of dominant word order makes it possible to readily apply the implicational universals to languages in which three-element clauses are extremely rare. In sum, this approach harnesses the implicational universals often used with the six-way typology to Dryer's Four-way typology to allow us to analyze languages with relatively few clauses with nominal subjects and objects.

Key concepts: Typology, Linguistic typology, Problem of universals, Linguistics, Word order, Word (group theory), Linguistic universal, Order (exchange)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
WORD ORDER TYPOLOGY IN MODERN SOUTH ARABIAN LANGUAGES: A STUDY BASED ON A CORPUS OF ANALYZED TEXTS — Research Paper | ScholarLens