Ambidexterity-as-Practice: Understanding the Role of the Manager in IT-Services Projects.
Neil Turner
Abstract
Neil Turner
Abstract
We argue that the literature on ambidexterity, defined here as the simultaneous enactment of exploration and exploitation, does not fully explore the detailed practices by which this may be achieved in practical, complex organisational working structures. This paper presents a qualitative insight into the management of ambidexterity in such an environment, specifically, IT-services projects, using the manager as the unit of analysis. We use this to investigate the idea of ambidexterity-as-practice, which has been underexplored. In particular, we examine the management of intellectual capital (human, social and organisational) to develop a more fine-grained understanding of the micro-foundations of ambidextrous practices. We show that the forms of intellectual capital are entwined with one another and with the processes of exploitation and exploration, and that to conceive of them as separate, as the literature to date has done, is an insufficient theorisation. We posit that this is an area that requires further investigation. Authors:
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We argue that the literature on ambidexterity, defined here as the simultaneous enactment of exploration and exploitation, does not fully explore the detailed practices by which this may be achieved in practical, complex organisational working structures. This paper presents a qualitative insight into the management of ambidexterity in such an environment, specifically, IT-services projects, using the manager as the unit of analysis. We use this to investigate the idea of ambidexterity-as-practice, which has been underexplored. In particular, we examine the management of intellectual capital (human, social and organisational) to develop a more fine-grained understanding of the micro-foundations of ambidextrous practices. We show that the forms of intellectual capital are entwined with one another and with the processes of exploitation and exploration, and that to conceive of them as separate, as the literature to date has done, is an insufficient theorisation. We posit that this is an area that requires further investigation. Authors:
Key concepts: Ambidexterity, Knowledge management, Business, Intellectual capital, Unit (ring theory), Process management, Computer science, Psychology