UK Media's Pathology of the Asylum Seeker & the (mis)Representation of Asylum as a Humanitarian Issue
Amadu Wurie Khan
Abstract
Amadu Wurie Khan
Abstract
This article argues that, broadly speaking, there are two strands of media representation of the asylum issue in the UK press– asylum-friendly and anti-asylum coverage – and that this dichotomy corresponds to a left-right political leaning. By so doing, the press provide their own understanding of asylum seekers and refugees: firstly, as ‘folk devils’ or the evil cultural ‘other’ mainly in the anti-asylum press, and secondly, as ‘victims’ mainly in the asylum-friendly press. The article consists of two main parts. The first discusses the ways in which the media analysis converges with asylum seekers/refugees’ perceptions of the media coverage. The second considers asylum seekers/refugees’ perceptions that through such representation, parts of the UK press have failed to communicate an already-existing meaning of asylum as defined by international conventions. Perceptions that the misrepresentation contributes to UK citizens’ ignorance of asylum as a humanitarian issue and hostility against asylum seekers/refugees are also considered.
OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This article argues that, broadly speaking, there are two strands of media representation of the asylum issue in the UK press– asylum-friendly and anti-asylum coverage – and that this dichotomy corresponds to a left-right political leaning. By so doing, the press provide their own understanding of asylum seekers and refugees: firstly, as ‘folk devils’ or the evil cultural ‘other’ mainly in the anti-asylum press, and secondly, as ‘victims’ mainly in the asylum-friendly press. The article consists of two main parts. The first discusses the ways in which the media analysis converges with asylum seekers/refugees’ perceptions of the media coverage. The second considers asylum seekers/refugees’ perceptions that through such representation, parts of the UK press have failed to communicate an already-existing meaning of asylum as defined by international conventions. Perceptions that the misrepresentation contributes to UK citizens’ ignorance of asylum as a humanitarian issue and hostility against asylum seekers/refugees are also considered.
Key concepts: Refugee, Misrepresentation, Asylum seeker, Ignorance, Representation (politics), Politics, Meaning (existential), Political science