2012•PubMedRequires access

Antitumoral efficacy of four histone deacetylase inhibitors in hepatoma in vitro and in vivo.

Marion Ganslmayer, Peter C. Konturek, C. Herold, Markus Friedrich Neurath, Steffen Zopf

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors are promising antitumoral drugs. Currently there are no data regarding the comparison of different HDAC inhibitors on hepatoma cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hepatoma cells were incubated with the HDAC inhibitors MS-275, SAHA, FK901228 and trichostatin. Proliferation was assessed via BrdU incorporation and apoptosis rate via flow cytometry. Trichostatin, SAHA and MS-275 were applied in a rat hepatoma model. RESULTS: The agents showed antiproliferative and pro-apoptotic effects time- and dose-dependently. SAHA and MS-275 were moderately effective at 10 μM, while trichostatin A and FK901228 showed higher potency. Caspases 3 and 8 were activated upon treatment with the drugs. The agents increased the acetylation rate. Hyperacetylation did not correlate with antitumoral efficacy. In vivo, SAHA was superior to MS-275 and trichostatin A. CONCLUSION: The HDAC inhibitors were effective both in vitro and in vivo. The potency of SAHA and MS-275 was similar. In spite of differing affinity to the 11 known HDACs, the agents induced comparable effects. These findings suggest that these agents have further antitumoral effects apart from HDAC inhibition.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors are promising antitumoral drugs. Currently there are no data regarding the comparison of different HDAC inhibitors on hepatoma cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hepatoma cells were incubated with the HDAC inhibitors MS-275, SAHA, FK901228 and trichostatin. Proliferation was assessed via BrdU incorporation and apoptosis rate via flow cytometry. Trichostatin, SAHA and MS-275 were applied in a rat hepatoma model. RESULTS: The agents showed antiproliferative and pro-apoptotic effects time- and dose-dependently. SAHA and MS-275 were moderately effective at 10 μM, while trichostatin A and FK901228 showed higher potency. Caspases 3 and 8 were activated upon treatment with the drugs. The agents increased the acetylation rate. Hyperacetylation did not correlate with antitumoral efficacy. In vivo, SAHA was superior to MS-275 and trichostatin A. CONCLUSION: The HDAC inhibitors were effective both in vitro and in vivo. The potency of SAHA and MS-275 was similar. In spite of differing affinity to the 11 known HDACs, the agents induced comparable effects. These findings suggest that these agents have further antitumoral effects apart from HDAC inhibition.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors are promising antitumoral drugs. Currently there are no data regarding the comparison of different HDAC inhibitors on hepatoma cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hepatoma cells were incubated with the HDAC inhibitors MS-275, SAHA, FK901228 and trichostatin. Proliferation was assessed via BrdU incorporation and apoptosis rate via flow cytometry. Trichostatin, SAHA and MS-275 were applied in a rat hepatoma model. RESULTS: The agents showed antiproliferative and pro-apoptotic effects time- and dose-dependently. SAHA and MS-275 were moderately effective at 10 μM, while trichostatin A and FK901228 showed higher potency. Caspases 3 and 8 were activated upon treatment with the drugs. The agents increased the acetylation rate. Hyperacetylation did not correlate with antitumoral efficacy. In vivo, SAHA was superior to MS-275 and trichostatin A. CONCLUSION: The HDAC inhibitors were effective both in vitro and in vivo. The potency of SAHA and MS-275 was similar. In spite of differing affinity to the 11 known HDACs, the agents induced comparable effects. These findings suggest that these agents have further antitumoral effects apart from HDAC inhibition.

Key concepts: Trichostatin A, Histone deacetylase, In vivo, In vitro, Apoptosis, Chemistry, Acetylation, Pharmacology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Antitumoral efficacy of four histone deacetylase inhibitors in hepatoma in vitro and in vivo. — Research Paper | ScholarLens