2003Unpublished venueRequires access

NANOSTRUCTURES IN ULTRAHIGH-PRESSURE METAMORPHIC COESITE AND DIAMOND: A GENETIC FINGERPRINT

F. Langenhorst, Bayerisches Geoinstitut

Open publisher page 17 citations

Abstract

Metamorphic coesite and diamond were studied in detail by transmission electron microscopy to test whether the high-pressure minerals preserve a nanostructural memory and report of their metamorphic formation and evolution. Metamorphic coesite from Dora Maira contains few, mostly sessile dislocations and is associated with retrograde quartz that nucleated at the margin and along twin boundaries in coesite. This back transformation occurred during exhumation and liberated water that now decorates Brazil twins in retrograde quartz. Metamorphic diamonds from the Kokchetav and Erzgebirge massifs are absolutely defect-free. The Erzgebirge diamonds are surrounded by a shell of hydrous minerals, suggesting a formation by precipitation from a C-O-H fluid. The lack of retrograde graphite indicates that metamorphic diamond is obviously more resistant to back transformation than coesite. These nanostructural characteristics contrast with those observed in coesite and diamond from kimberlite and impact rocks, substantiating that the defect structure provides a valuable genetic fingerprint.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Metamorphic coesite and diamond were studied in detail by transmission electron microscopy to test whether the high-pressure minerals preserve a nanostructural memory and report of their metamorphic formation and evolution. Metamorphic coesite from Dora Maira contains few, mostly sessile dislocations and is associated with retrograde quartz that nucleated at the margin and along twin boundaries in coesite. This back transformation occurred during exhumation and liberated water that now decorates Brazil twins in retrograde quartz. Metamorphic diamonds from the Kokchetav and Erzgebirge massifs are absolutely defect-free. The Erzgebirge diamonds are surrounded by a shell of hydrous minerals, suggesting a formation by precipitation from a C-O-H fluid. The lack of retrograde graphite indicates that metamorphic diamond is obviously more resistant to back transformation than coesite. These nanostructural characteristics contrast with those observed in coesite and diamond from kimberlite and impact rocks, substantiating that the defect structure provides a valuable genetic fingerprint.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 17 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Metamorphic coesite and diamond were studied in detail by transmission electron microscopy to test whether the high-pressure minerals preserve a nanostructural memory and report of their metamorphic formation and evolution. Metamorphic coesite from Dora Maira contains few, mostly sessile dislocations and is associated with retrograde quartz that nucleated at the margin and along twin boundaries in coesite. This back transformation occurred during exhumation and liberated water that now decorates Brazil twins in retrograde quartz. Metamorphic diamonds from the Kokchetav and Erzgebirge massifs are absolutely defect-free. The Erzgebirge diamonds are surrounded by a shell of hydrous minerals, suggesting a formation by precipitation from a C-O-H fluid. The lack of retrograde graphite indicates that metamorphic diamond is obviously more resistant to back transformation than coesite. These nanostructural characteristics contrast with those observed in coesite and diamond from kimberlite and impact rocks, substantiating that the defect structure provides a valuable genetic fingerprint.

Key concepts: Coesite, Metamorphic rock, Diamond, Geology, Geochemistry, Massif, Quartz, Pseudomorph

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
NANOSTRUCTURES IN ULTRAHIGH-PRESSURE METAMORPHIC COESITE AND DIAMOND: A GENETIC FINGERPRINT — Research Paper | ScholarLens