Comparison of Skinfold Thickness Measurement and Bioelectrical Impedance Method for Assessment of Body Fat
Pradeep Singh Chahar
Abstract
Pradeep Singh Chahar
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the body fat percentage using two different methods of fat assessment like skinfold thickness measurement and bioelectrical impedance. A total of thirty healthy male with age ranges 26 to 49 years were selected as a subject. Predicted percentage body fat (%BF) was derived from skinfold equation given by Durnin and Womersley and bioelectrical impedance by Maltron BF 908 body composition analyzer. Correlation coefficients results showed that there was a good relationship between these two different methods for fat assessment (r = .667). The mean body fat percentage determined by bioelectrical impedance was significantly lower than that measured by skinfold thickness measurement. Results revealed significant difference among skinfold thickness measurement and bioelectrical impedance method (t = 13.100; p < .001). Therefore, it may be concluded that as compare to bioelectrical impedance analysis, skinfold thickness measurement overestimated body fat percentages within a normal subjects although there was a good correlation exist between these two methods.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The purpose of this study was to compare the body fat percentage using two different methods of fat assessment like skinfold thickness measurement and bioelectrical impedance. A total of thirty healthy male with age ranges 26 to 49 years were selected as a subject. Predicted percentage body fat (%BF) was derived from skinfold equation given by Durnin and Womersley and bioelectrical impedance by Maltron BF 908 body composition analyzer. Correlation coefficients results showed that there was a good relationship between these two different methods for fat assessment (r = .667). The mean body fat percentage determined by bioelectrical impedance was significantly lower than that measured by skinfold thickness measurement. Results revealed significant difference among skinfold thickness measurement and bioelectrical impedance method (t = 13.100; p < .001). Therefore, it may be concluded that as compare to bioelectrical impedance analysis, skinfold thickness measurement overestimated body fat percentages within a normal subjects although there was a good correlation exist between these two methods.
Key concepts: Bioelectrical impedance analysis, Skinfold thickness, Medicine, Nuclear medicine, Anatomy, Body weight, Internal medicine, Body mass index