2013Unpublished venueRequires access

Comparison of Skinfold Thickness Measurement and Bioelectrical Impedance Method for Assessment of Body Fat

Pradeep Singh Chahar

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the body fat percentage using two different methods of fat assessment like skinfold thickness measurement and bioelectrical impedance. A total of thirty healthy male with age ranges 26 to 49 years were selected as a subject. Predicted percentage body fat (%BF) was derived from skinfold equation given by Durnin and Womersley and bioelectrical impedance by Maltron BF 908 body composition analyzer. Correlation coefficients results showed that there was a good relationship between these two different methods for fat assessment (r = .667). The mean body fat percentage determined by bioelectrical impedance was significantly lower than that measured by skinfold thickness measurement. Results revealed significant difference among skinfold thickness measurement and bioelectrical impedance method (t = 13.100; p < .001). Therefore, it may be concluded that as compare to bioelectrical impedance analysis, skinfold thickness measurement overestimated body fat percentages within a normal subjects although there was a good correlation exist between these two methods.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The purpose of this study was to compare the body fat percentage using two different methods of fat assessment like skinfold thickness measurement and bioelectrical impedance. A total of thirty healthy male with age ranges 26 to 49 years were selected as a subject. Predicted percentage body fat (%BF) was derived from skinfold equation given by Durnin and Womersley and bioelectrical impedance by Maltron BF 908 body composition analyzer. Correlation coefficients results showed that there was a good relationship between these two different methods for fat assessment (r = .667). The mean body fat percentage determined by bioelectrical impedance was significantly lower than that measured by skinfold thickness measurement. Results revealed significant difference among skinfold thickness measurement and bioelectrical impedance method (t = 13.100; p < .001). Therefore, it may be concluded that as compare to bioelectrical impedance analysis, skinfold thickness measurement overestimated body fat percentages within a normal subjects although there was a good correlation exist between these two methods.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the body fat percentage using two different methods of fat assessment like skinfold thickness measurement and bioelectrical impedance. A total of thirty healthy male with age ranges 26 to 49 years were selected as a subject. Predicted percentage body fat (%BF) was derived from skinfold equation given by Durnin and Womersley and bioelectrical impedance by Maltron BF 908 body composition analyzer. Correlation coefficients results showed that there was a good relationship between these two different methods for fat assessment (r = .667). The mean body fat percentage determined by bioelectrical impedance was significantly lower than that measured by skinfold thickness measurement. Results revealed significant difference among skinfold thickness measurement and bioelectrical impedance method (t = 13.100; p < .001). Therefore, it may be concluded that as compare to bioelectrical impedance analysis, skinfold thickness measurement overestimated body fat percentages within a normal subjects although there was a good correlation exist between these two methods.

Key concepts: Bioelectrical impedance analysis, Skinfold thickness, Medicine, Nuclear medicine, Anatomy, Body weight, Internal medicine, Body mass index

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of Skinfold Thickness Measurement and Bioelectrical Impedance Method for Assessment of Body Fat — Research Paper | ScholarLens