2004Unpublished venueRequires access

CITIZENS OR WORKERS? BASIC INCOME VS. WELFARE-TO-WORK POLICIES

José Antonio Noguera

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

In this paper I intend to show how the idea of an unconditional income guarantee (or Basic Income) is directly embodied within the moral intuitions which underlie the political traditions that built the modern welfare state. I shall give some reasons why this guarantee should not be subjected to any kind of work condition, such as those which are required by present workfare and welfare-to-work policies. These policies, unlike Basic Income, try to intensify the link between employment and the right to cash benefits. My thesis is that, in present socio-economic conditions, it is much more equitable and efficient to uncouple income support from employment. I will develop this thesis against the sophisticated defence of reciprocity and welfare-to-work policies made recently by Stuart White in his book The Civic Minimum (2003).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this paper I intend to show how the idea of an unconditional income guarantee (or Basic Income) is directly embodied within the moral intuitions which underlie the political traditions that built the modern welfare state. I shall give some reasons why this guarantee should not be subjected to any kind of work condition, such as those which are required by present workfare and welfare-to-work policies. These policies, unlike Basic Income, try to intensify the link between employment and the right to cash benefits. My thesis is that, in present socio-economic conditions, it is much more equitable and efficient to uncouple income support from employment. I will develop this thesis against the sophisticated defence of reciprocity and welfare-to-work policies made recently by Stuart White in his book The Civic Minimum (2003).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this paper I intend to show how the idea of an unconditional income guarantee (or Basic Income) is directly embodied within the moral intuitions which underlie the political traditions that built the modern welfare state. I shall give some reasons why this guarantee should not be subjected to any kind of work condition, such as those which are required by present workfare and welfare-to-work policies. These policies, unlike Basic Income, try to intensify the link between employment and the right to cash benefits. My thesis is that, in present socio-economic conditions, it is much more equitable and efficient to uncouple income support from employment. I will develop this thesis against the sophisticated defence of reciprocity and welfare-to-work policies made recently by Stuart White in his book The Civic Minimum (2003).

Key concepts: Basic income, Workfare, Work (physics), Welfare, Reciprocity (cultural anthropology), Economics, Welfare state, Politics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
CITIZENS OR WORKERS? BASIC INCOME VS. WELFARE-TO-WORK POLICIES — Research Paper | ScholarLens