2012Unpublished venueRequires access

Central Counterparty Clearing: Incentives, Market Discipline and the Cost of Collateral

Thorsten V. Koeppl

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

This paper analyzes central counterparty (CCP) clearing { dened as the diversication of default risk through novation { in the presence of moral hazard that aggravates counterparty risk. Collateral is costly and serves two purposes: it insures against default and provides incentives to avoid moral hazard. When counterparty risk is not directly observable, I show that central clearing can lead to higher collateral requirements for two dierent reasons. First, a CCP oering diversication of risk cannot selectively forgo incentives for transactions that optimally use collateral only for insurance. Second, requiring more collateral for better incentives can reduce market liquidity and adversely aect market discipline which is a substitute for collateral. Hence, while CCP clearing can lower default through higher collateral requirements,

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper analyzes central counterparty (CCP) clearing { dened as the diversication of default risk through novation { in the presence of moral hazard that aggravates counterparty risk. Collateral is costly and serves two purposes: it insures against default and provides incentives to avoid moral hazard. When counterparty risk is not directly observable, I show that central clearing can lead to higher collateral requirements for two dierent reasons. First, a CCP oering diversication of risk cannot selectively forgo incentives for transactions that optimally use collateral only for insurance. Second, requiring more collateral for better incentives can reduce market liquidity and adversely aect market discipline which is a substitute for collateral. Hence, while CCP clearing can lower default through higher collateral requirements,

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper analyzes central counterparty (CCP) clearing { dened as the diversication of default risk through novation { in the presence of moral hazard that aggravates counterparty risk. Collateral is costly and serves two purposes: it insures against default and provides incentives to avoid moral hazard. When counterparty risk is not directly observable, I show that central clearing can lead to higher collateral requirements for two dierent reasons. First, a CCP oering diversication of risk cannot selectively forgo incentives for transactions that optimally use collateral only for insurance. Second, requiring more collateral for better incentives can reduce market liquidity and adversely aect market discipline which is a substitute for collateral. Hence, while CCP clearing can lower default through higher collateral requirements,

Key concepts: Collateral, Counterparty, Clearing, Incentive, Moral hazard, Credit risk, Business, Market liquidity

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Central Counterparty Clearing: Incentives, Market Discipline and the Cost of Collateral — Research Paper | ScholarLens