2016•Texas journal of agriculture and natural resourcesOpen access

Management of Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in Second-Generation Glyphosate-Resistant Cotton

Max A. Batla, Jack Wayne Keeling, Peter A. Dotray

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in 2005 and 2006 to evaluate glyphosate timings and use of residual herbicides to control Palmer amaranth ( Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats.) in second-generation glyphosate-resistant cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.).  Glyphosate treatments based on timing were used , in addition to preplant incorporated and postemergence-topical residual herbicides , to determine effective Palmer amaranth management systems.  In 2005, complete control (100%) of Palmer amaranth was achieved across all glyphosate postemergence-topical systems.  Less than complete control (94 to 98%) was observed with postemergence-directed glyphosate-resistant systems either with or without trifluralin preplant incorporated compared to second-generation glyphosate-resistant postemergence-topical systems.  In 2006, similar Palmer amaranth control (95 to 99%) was observed across all second-generation glyphosate-resistant systems following trifluralin preplant incorporated and no benefit was observed from pyrithiobac or S -metolachlor tank-mixed with glyphosate.  When trifluralin was not used, pyrithiobac or S -metolachlor tank-mixed with glyphosate early postemergence-topical followed by glyphosate improved control compared to glyphosate alone.  Delaying early-season glyphosate applications did not reduce cotton lint yield; however, when no glyphosate was used cotton yields were reduced.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Field experiments were conducted in 2005 and 2006 to evaluate glyphosate timings and use of residual herbicides to control Palmer amaranth ( Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats.) in second-generation glyphosate-resistant cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.).  Glyphosate treatments based on timing were used , in addition to preplant incorporated and postemergence-topical residual herbicides , to determine effective Palmer amaranth management systems.  In 2005, complete control (100%) of Palmer amaranth was achieved across all glyphosate postemergence-topical systems.  Less than complete control (94 to 98%) was observed with postemergence-directed glyphosate-resistant systems either with or without trifluralin preplant incorporated compared to second-generation glyphosate-resistant postemergence-topical systems.  In 2006, similar Palmer amaranth control (95 to 99%) was observed across all second-generation glyphosate-resistant systems following trifluralin preplant incorporated and no benefit was observed from pyrithiobac or S -metolachlor tank-mixed with glyphosate.  When trifluralin was not used, pyrithiobac or S -metolachlor tank-mixed with glyphosate early postemergence-topical followed by glyphosate improved control compared to glyphosate alone.  Delaying early-season glyphosate applications did not reduce cotton lint yield; however, when no glyphosate was used cotton yields were reduced.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Field experiments were conducted in 2005 and 2006 to evaluate glyphosate timings and use of residual herbicides to control Palmer amaranth ( Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats.) in second-generation glyphosate-resistant cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.).  Glyphosate treatments based on timing were used , in addition to preplant incorporated and postemergence-topical residual herbicides , to determine effective Palmer amaranth management systems.  In 2005, complete control (100%) of Palmer amaranth was achieved across all glyphosate postemergence-topical systems.  Less than complete control (94 to 98%) was observed with postemergence-directed glyphosate-resistant systems either with or without trifluralin preplant incorporated compared to second-generation glyphosate-resistant postemergence-topical systems.  In 2006, similar Palmer amaranth control (95 to 99%) was observed across all second-generation glyphosate-resistant systems following trifluralin preplant incorporated and no benefit was observed from pyrithiobac or S -metolachlor tank-mixed with glyphosate.  When trifluralin was not used, pyrithiobac or S -metolachlor tank-mixed with glyphosate early postemergence-topical followed by glyphosate improved control compared to glyphosate alone.  Delaying early-season glyphosate applications did not reduce cotton lint yield; however, when no glyphosate was used cotton yields were reduced.

Key concepts: Glyphosate, Amaranth, Trifluralin, Lint, Agronomy, Weed control, Gossypium hirsutum, Malvaceae

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Management of Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in Second-Generation Glyphosate-Resistant Cotton — Research Paper | ScholarLens