2004Unpublished venueOpen access

Regulation of Monopolies A Randomized Approach

Mikael Lindén

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract. Two formal models are proposed to describe the gains of randomizing the regulation and price control of monopolies. In the first model, a monopolist faces a nonzero probability of being regulated by the authorities due its pricing policy. This leads to a self-regulation. Threat of regulation induces monopoly to pay a risk premium to consumers in a form of reduced product price. The analytical solution of model leads to a form that may have some practical relevance in empirical research. Second model shows, if monopolies are allowed for, that the randomized non-competitive product price control implies a higher social welfare than without randomization. The used indirect utility function approach enables us to show that the social welfare function is non-concave in some region of monopoly prices. The implications of the models for competition policy are clear. In some cases the breaking up the monopolies is not the only alternative. A randomized price regulation policy can give results that are welfare and efficiency improving. *) Paper presented at SCANDALE “Competition, Law and Economics ” conference

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract. Two formal models are proposed to describe the gains of randomizing the regulation and price control of monopolies. In the first model, a monopolist faces a nonzero probability of being regulated by the authorities due its pricing policy. This leads to a self-regulation. Threat of regulation induces monopoly to pay a risk premium to consumers in a form of reduced product price. The analytical solution of model leads to a form that may have some practical relevance in empirical research. Second model shows, if monopolies are allowed for, that the randomized non-competitive product price control implies a higher social welfare than without randomization. The used indirect utility function approach enables us to show that the social welfare function is non-concave in some region of monopoly prices. The implications of the models for competition policy are clear. In some cases the breaking up the monopolies is not the only alternative. A randomized price regulation policy can give results that are welfare and efficiency improving. *) Paper presented at SCANDALE “Competition, Law and Economics ” conference

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract. Two formal models are proposed to describe the gains of randomizing the regulation and price control of monopolies. In the first model, a monopolist faces a nonzero probability of being regulated by the authorities due its pricing policy. This leads to a self-regulation. Threat of regulation induces monopoly to pay a risk premium to consumers in a form of reduced product price. The analytical solution of model leads to a form that may have some practical relevance in empirical research. Second model shows, if monopolies are allowed for, that the randomized non-competitive product price control implies a higher social welfare than without randomization. The used indirect utility function approach enables us to show that the social welfare function is non-concave in some region of monopoly prices. The implications of the models for competition policy are clear. In some cases the breaking up the monopolies is not the only alternative. A randomized price regulation policy can give results that are welfare and efficiency improving. *) Paper presented at SCANDALE “Competition, Law and Economics ” conference

Key concepts: Monopoly, Economics, Microeconomics, Product (mathematics), Competition (biology), Natural monopoly, Function (biology), Product differentiation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Regulation of Monopolies A Randomized Approach — Research Paper | ScholarLens