Regulation of Monopolies A Randomized Approach
Mikael Lindén
Abstract
Mikael Lindén
Abstract
Abstract. Two formal models are proposed to describe the gains of randomizing the regulation and price control of monopolies. In the first model, a monopolist faces a nonzero probability of being regulated by the authorities due its pricing policy. This leads to a self-regulation. Threat of regulation induces monopoly to pay a risk premium to consumers in a form of reduced product price. The analytical solution of model leads to a form that may have some practical relevance in empirical research. Second model shows, if monopolies are allowed for, that the randomized non-competitive product price control implies a higher social welfare than without randomization. The used indirect utility function approach enables us to show that the social welfare function is non-concave in some region of monopoly prices. The implications of the models for competition policy are clear. In some cases the breaking up the monopolies is not the only alternative. A randomized price regulation policy can give results that are welfare and efficiency improving. *) Paper presented at SCANDALE “Competition, Law and Economics ” conference
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract. Two formal models are proposed to describe the gains of randomizing the regulation and price control of monopolies. In the first model, a monopolist faces a nonzero probability of being regulated by the authorities due its pricing policy. This leads to a self-regulation. Threat of regulation induces monopoly to pay a risk premium to consumers in a form of reduced product price. The analytical solution of model leads to a form that may have some practical relevance in empirical research. Second model shows, if monopolies are allowed for, that the randomized non-competitive product price control implies a higher social welfare than without randomization. The used indirect utility function approach enables us to show that the social welfare function is non-concave in some region of monopoly prices. The implications of the models for competition policy are clear. In some cases the breaking up the monopolies is not the only alternative. A randomized price regulation policy can give results that are welfare and efficiency improving. *) Paper presented at SCANDALE “Competition, Law and Economics ” conference
Key concepts: Monopoly, Economics, Microeconomics, Product (mathematics), Competition (biology), Natural monopoly, Function (biology), Product differentiation